this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
302 points (99.0% liked)

Programming

20371 readers
125 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Author response:

Lena juggles lesson plans, bedtime stories, and plot twists—sometimes all in the same day. A teacher by day, a writer by night, and a mom 24/7, she crafts paranormal romances with magic, mystery, and just the right amount of chaos. When she’s not wrangling students or characters, she’s probably drinking coffee and pretending it’s a potion for extra energy.

Hi everyone,

I want to openly and sincerely address something that’s come to light regarding my book. A prompt was recently found in the text. It's something that should never have made it into the final version. I want to apologize deeply to my readers and to the writing community.

The truth is, I used AI to help edit and shape parts of the book. As a full-time teacher and mom, I simply can't afford a professional editor, and I turned to AI as a tool to help refine my writing. Teaching wages make it hard enough to support a family, and writing has been a passion project I pursued in the small pockets of time I could find. My goal was always to entertain, not to mislead.

That said, the appearance of an editing prompt in the final book was a mistake — one that I take full responsibility for. It has unintentionally sparked a broader conversation about AI in creative work, and I understand the concerns. I’m taking this seriously and will be reviewing the book carefully, making corrections where needed, and being more transparent in the future about my process.

To my readers: thank you for your support, your honesty, and your patience. I’m learning from this and will do better. To the wider community: I'm sorry.

Big "I'm a mom everything I do is excused because my motherhood" vibes.

All her books seems to be free on digital format and just about $3 on printed paper, and doesn't seem like even for free, a lot of people read it. So it's not like a big scam or something, I doubt she really makes any money with this.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

What bothers me about this is that the author fraudulently presented the book as her own work. Doesn't matter to me if she used AI or hired a ghost writer - claiming you wrote something you didn't write is fraud IMO. I've never understood how ghost writers are legal.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago

Tony Schwartz, ghost-writer of The Art of the Deal, who spent hundreds of hours with Trump, has called him, "the worst human being we've seen in a long while: no values, no beliefs, not a single charming redeeming quality."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

or hired a ghost writer

Isn't that the entire point of hiring a ghost writer?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Isn't what the entire point?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Their goddamn ghosts maaaaaihn

buckethat wearing, three quarter lengths with red tinted sumglesses, 1990s conspiracy theorist voice

[–] [email protected] 90 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Hate this title, how about:

"A novel by author Lena McDonald, accidentally leaves AI prompt in published version."

[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Or, more accurately, 'a novel that is at most partially by Lena McDonald'.

[–] Kissaki 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or "a novel published as authored by Lena McDonald contains AI prompt"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

"allegedly written"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

lol, way better!

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's bad enough that they are using AI to create their content, but don't they even proof-read it before uploading it? It seems like the most basic requirement, but they don't even seem to be bothering with that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

real authors have editors. If you replace the author with an ai, you still need an editor. There is no version of the current style of ai that can replace an editor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

If only someone had created a proofreading AI.

Prompt: proofread the draft of my novel at a 6th grade reading level.

[–] MadhuGururajan 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I guess I realise now that the value of something is not what people believe it to be. It is the length of suffering and effort the creator went through.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Something something something

🌍👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I think that's where the world of art appreciation is now quite visibly breaking along a divide that has existed for a while. Some have always just valued the product: means be damned, if the end is enjoyable enough. For others, the process matters; for some even more than the result.

The latter group seems larger, though they may just be more passionate about their views and accordingly vocal (personally, I suspect both are the case, but I don't know of any solid evidence).

Such is the way of new technology: it challenges traditional values. That doesn't mean those values are without merit or have to be overturned, but I think it's valuable that they're challenged at least.

Here's to hoping they stand the test.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Leave your guess for how long we've got till AI apps are spammed everywhere.

Also for no reason in particular:

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

They don't mention enshittification - I think Doctorow popularized the term later - but this is a perfect example of a process that contributes to the phenomenon.

I had never thought about it in these terms, but they repeatedly mentioned curation, and it's so clearly a fundamental topic in today's online world.

This was an incredible video, thanks for sharing. It gave me a new perspective to consider.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

My son and I laughed our asses off over that presentation. Brilliant but kind of disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

🔥👄🔥 There should be severe consequences for this.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It would suck for the author, Lena McDonald, if anyone who searched for

"Lena McDonald author"

found out about this story.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I get what you're doing but they can just change pennames

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

They can, but that would at best be a hard reset on their reputation as an author, and unlikely to work long-term

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The vibe coders and every person using an LLM can't complain about it. It's fair game.

[–] 3rr4tt1c 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

AI can be ethically used in writing. This is not an example of that. People need to get into the "AI as a tool" mindset. And capitalism causing greed is part of the issue of course.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Writing is a rare form of communication, borderline unique to humans. Because of that, to me, it’s fundamentally unethical to have “AI” “write” anything. It’s insulting to me on a base level, particularly when used for communication.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

AI can be a fine tool to get writing inspiration, as with programming. It's not fine as used in this article's example.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Sad disabled person who use AI tools to help communicate noises.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We could also use a model or 2 trained on ethical data.

Until then its pretty easy to argue all ai is unethical.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Would citing all the training sources satisfy the spirit of attribution licenses like CC-BY?