daniskarma

joined 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Pay por the permanent ownership of the sold product.

As they say. If selling isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing.

If a seller doesn't give me option to own their products I will certainly never steal them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Why no vote equals a vote for Trump instead of the contrary a vote for Harris?

You are assuming that all people not voting or voting other party would vote for Harris, but this is probably not true.

Many of those people would vote for Trump if forced. Thus it would be better for the Harris campaign that they stayed home or keep voting for the Tea Party or some other third right wing party without representation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I like the topic system. Allows to post and see without worries of duplication.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (6 children)

The problem is that the niche community exist. In fact it probably exists several times, one in each instance with a small number of followers. Which makes really hard to go and decide in which community you want to invest.

It's one fundamental problem of federative systems and to be solved some of the federal nature need to be partially given away, but I think is necessary. I propose two solutions:

  1. Automatic merging of communities. All communities with the same name within a federation are de facto replicated. So a post in any community just replicate in all. It will make it seem like there's only one community.

2 Discourage. Everytime you try to create a community that already exists in other instance a pop up appears that encourage you to just go to the other community. For already duplicated communities messages are sent to concentrate in the biggest one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

People are well known for never ever running over anything or anyone.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Do you have a source of that Germany museum?, I do not find it online.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Same in Spain.

Everything is digitalized and you have the right to do everything digitally. I've never mailed anything to the government.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

AI is nothing more than a way for big businesses to automate more work and fire more people.

All technology in human history has done that. What are you proposing? Reject technology to keep people employed on inefficient tasks?

At some point people need to start thinking that is better to end capitalism that to return to monke.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

Literally the only big problem with china one-child policy, was that sexist parents were practicing selective abortions to ensure that they get one male kid.

No sexism = no problem

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

By simple math each of those 1 billion people should be able to live with 10 times more resources at hand that if we had 10 billion people.

I don't think there's a way to live better without resource consumption and environmental damage. So the question keeps being the same. More people living worse or less people living better.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Each human needs a LOT of land to live to their fullest.

Do you want to live like in the 30s only to house more people?

Also it's an unsustainable point of view. If you defend letting people forever grow there's going to be a hard natural stop to that. Because at some point nature will make you stop.

I support a stable point of view. One billion of human beings on earth. Plenty space for us and for nature, les pollution, less emissions. Lots of chances for massive natural reserves...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The more humans we have the worse we will live.

I suppose it's a moral choice. More people living worse or less people living better.

I prefer the later. Specially because the prize is just having less children, it's just a small cultural change.

I get nothing out of a crowded world where I have to be miserable just to make space for more people.

Less people being able to live to their fullest seems the more humanist approach.

 

I cannot stand google news any more, too much spam, clickbait and advertisement. So I decided to try to selfhost an RSS aggregator to make myself a news feed that I would be comfortable with. Being RSS such an "ancient" thing I thought there will be many mature systems, but I'm not sure that's the case..

As far as my investigation goes there are two main options out there** TT-RSS (tiny tiny RSS) and FreshRSS**. There seems to also be miniflux but it supposedly have very few features.

So I tried the both main ones and I ended up kind of disappointed, I hope that I'm missing something. My requirements are:

1-Have a nice interface, card view, phone friendly. Basically being able to look the same as google news looked. So both have a pretty dated interface. And terrible responsive UI for phones. I was kind of able to make a "card view" with TT-RSS but looked hideous and didn't really work on phone screen, also applying themes broke TT-RSS, this will be recurring theme but it looks like TT-RSS is constantly breaking a rolling release system makes it very unstable and many plugins, themes and third party apps don't work right now because some new update broke everything. So native theming wasn't going to be a thing, so I tried third party apps. I found many that worked with FreshRSS and settled on Feedme, it looked exactly as I wanted, great. One point for FreshRSS. Feedme was supposedly compatible with TTRSS but I could not login, I have the suspicion that one update broke integration. I'm not even try to attempt to ask in their forums as I see that some time ago somebody asked the same question and got banned from their forums.

2-Being able to filter or prioritize feeds The problem is that I would love to suscribe to very diverse feeds, some would post maybe over a 100 post per day and others maybe one post every week or even month. So if let everything by default the former would flood the feed and I would never see the post from the little feeds. Here both offer categories that I could use but ideally I would love to have a curated main page. FreshRSS supposedly have a priority system but it seems quite simple and not effective for my needs, AFAIK you can put some feeds in "important feeds" but it only would show those feeds in that category then. TTRSS does have an advance filter system that is complex enough and with some fiddling I think I could make a set of rules that satisfy my needs. One point for TTRSS.

3-Being able to suscribe to any feed or even scrape webs that doesn't provide feeds. Here FreshRSS wins, I have zero issues subscribing to everything I wanted. With TTRSS I couldn't even subscribe with some pages that did provide with a feed, even if it was in an unconventional way. TTRSS devs say that is the webpage problem (even if FreshRSS had no problem with it). Here another point to FreshRSS.

And that is it, I do not exige that much. But I wasn't able to find a system that ticks those three checkboxes. FreshRSS was so close. But unless I am missing something you can't really create a curate feed that prioritizes and sorts feeds and posts in the way you can do with TTRSS sorting, if there is a way please let me know. And without that the whole thing becomes useless from the flooding feeds. And while I'm in love with TTRSS filters and sorting system, the whole app seems to unstable and with so many bugs to be usable, at least in my desired usercase (and I've seem many people complaining about TTRSS updates breaking things all the time).

My two main questions are:

-Am I missing some other self-hosted app that could do all I wanted?

-Am I missing some FreshRSS feature or extension that could curate a main feed with my own rules?

Any thoughts?

view more: next ›