overview for UlrikHD

List of support/meta communities for each instance in c/[email protected]

[–] UlrikHD 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://old.reddit.com/user/Ulrik-HD/

[–] UlrikHD 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Got it. I saw that Vacant was then in the mod list, I've transferred the community to you (based on seniority) and removed Vacant from the moderator list.

New Moderator in c/hardware

[–] UlrikHD 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Hi, is the other moderator inactive/stepping away?

Russian bots are out of control, how can we fight back? in c/lemmy_dev

[–] UlrikHD 0 points 3 weeks ago

Just a reminder that section "3.6. Vote Manipulation" of programming.dev's CoC prohibits targeted downvotes and mass downvoting of posts. You've already broken it by mass downvoting JokeDeity's old posts, please don't break it further. If you keep breaking our CoC, a temporary ban may be given.

[Announcement] Official Community Guidelines are now published in c/meta

[–] UlrikHD 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It is a precautionary policy to avoid what is currently just a theoretical. You'll be the first to create personal blog community so it will be interesting to see how it works out.

Nothing is set in stone of course and policies may be revised, I won't make any claim that the current set of guidelines are perfect and immutable.

[Announcement] Official Community Guidelines are now published in c/meta

[–] UlrikHD 0 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

The intention of requiring a 3rd party to act as a moderator is to avoid mod abuse from the blog author such as deleting comments or banning people for unreasonable reasons. E.g. someone correcting an error in a blog post and then having their comment deleted and banned by the author in retaliation.

Ideally Lemmy would have more granular level of mod authorisation so that we could just remove access to deleting and banning people.

If someone makes a non-relevant post in the community, it would be removed. If it becomes a recurring problem, we can look into automating that process.

[Announcement] Official Community Guidelines are now published in c/meta

[–] UlrikHD 0 points 4 weeks ago

Huh, I wasn't aware that the alternate frontends offered more utility. Looks pretty nice actually, thanks for the tip.

Programming.dev offers the tesseract frontend here: https://t.programming.dev/

[Announcement] Official Community Guidelines are now published in c/meta

[–] UlrikHD 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (7 children)

The mod tools are unfortunately pretty poor on Lemmy. For adding/removing moderators via the GUI the person must first post/comment in that specific community. You can then via the context menu of that post/comment add someone as a mod.

The alternative is to interact with the Lemmy API directly via a script.

I've added myself as a moderator, although the whole admin team may operate as moderators, similar to [email protected].

If you got additional changes you want to make to the community, e.g. add additional rules like make it explicit that only you can post, or add a banner to the community you should do it now before you're removed as a moderator. Otherwise you can always DM me/the admin team if you want to make changes to it.

Edit: As Blaze pointed out, you can use alternate frontends like https://t.programming.dev/ to gain additional GUI mod tools

Personal blog communities on programming.dev? in c/meta

[–] UlrikHD 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hi, we have now published official community guidelines as announced in this post.

Please let us now in the linked post if there is still something unanswered.

57

[Announcement] Official Community Guidelines are now published (legal.programming.dev)

submitted 1 month ago by UlrikHD to c/meta

18 comments fedilink

Programming.dev now has official community guidelines. These should help clarify what sort of local communities we allow to be hosted on the instance and the rules we expect them to follow.

As most programmers are aware, anticipating every edge case is generally not viable, so these are just guidelines, not written-in-stone rules. The admin team will still evaluate communities on a case-by-case basis, and exceptions are always possible.

If you have any feedback on the guidelines, we are more than happy to hear them, so please post them below.

the bot strikes again in c/meta

[–] UlrikHD 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, we ban the spam accounts on the first report we receive.

Daily Discussion - 25 February 2025 in c/[email protected]

[–] UlrikHD 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, no problem. Funnily enough Nottingham Forest already had the alias nottingham stored.

Here's every club alias for the bot:

[Announcement] A list of hidden communities on programming.dev is now public in c/meta

[–] UlrikHD 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you can't see posts you make on hidden communities that you are subscribed to on your profile, that sounds like a possible bug, and I'd encourage you to report the issue to the Lemmy repo

75

[Announcement] A list of hidden communities on programming.dev is now public (legal.programming.dev)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by UlrikHD to c/meta

24 comments fedilink

As a follow up to our previous announcement post, we have now set up a page to display every community that is hidden for our local users.

As explained on that page:

Programming.dev will hide political communities, NSFW/pornographic communities and communities that have a majority of their content produced by bots. While a community is hidden, it and its posts and comments will not show up in post feeds or in the search results unless you have explicitly subscribed to it. Communities themselves currently do not show up in community search results, this may change in the future; see #2943.

Users can subscribe to a hidden community to remove the hidden effect status of a community, however it can be difficult for a user to find out which communities are due to them not being searchable.

67

[Announcement] [email protected] is now set as hidden (unless you subscribe) (self.meta)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by UlrikHD to c/meta

24 comments fedilink

As per our policy of hiding political communities, pornographic communities and communities hosting bot spam, [email protected] is now set to hidden as its content is mainly USA centric political news.

Those of you who want to continue to see posts from [email protected] are encouraged to subscribe to the community, which will make the it visible for your account.

The mods over [email protected] have already been notified of this move and understand our decision, please do not bother them by pinging them here.

A previous announcement post of other hidden communities can be seen here

69

[Announcement] New set of communities made hidden (self.meta)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by UlrikHD to c/meta

45 comments fedilink

We have over a period of time gotten repeated reports of unmarked NSFW posts in certain communities. All of these communities share the same singular mod, who have shown indifference when content has been reported. As leaving NSFW posts unmarked is against our instance rules, we have moved to set the rule-breaking communities to hidden.

Those of you who subscribe to hidden communities will continue to see them as normal, for everyone else these communities will look empty and hidden from c/all.

The newly hidden communities are:

We would also like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that programming.dev's policy is to by default hide political communities, pornographic communities and communities hosting bot spam. Users seeking such content can subscribe to hidden communities so see them as normal.

Just recently we also went ahead and hid communities from lemmygrad due to the politics clause.

As always we encourage our local users to report content that break our instance rules. All content you report are seen by the admin team and helps inform the team of what's going on across the fediverse.

8

[solved] Checking admin status of user via the API (self.lemmy_support)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by UlrikHD to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink

Sorry if this is the wrong community, not sure where else to post the question, and I'd rather avoid creating an issue over on Github.

Is there a way to check if a federated user is an administrator via the API? .get_person_details() will have the admin field set to false for all other than local admins and .get_community() only reveals the list of moderators.

I know I could scrape the admin list from the main page html, but scraping html is prone to errors if an instance uses an alternative frontend or the frontend is updated. Getting the data via the API should be a more stable solution.

Based on #3703 it seems like a decent chance that this information isn't currently exposed to federated instances though?

53

[Closed] Looking for new moderators #302 (self.programmer_humor)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by UlrikHD to c/programmer_humor

9 comments fedilink

Describe the problem

3/4 moderators of the community are inactive, leading to a backlog of unresolved reports from the community.

Suggested solution

Find 1-2 active programming.dev users in the community volunteering to moderate c/programmer_humor in the comments of this post.

Expected time cost

A few minutes each week, the volume of the reports from the community is currently low.

Temporary solution

The community will be moderated by the admin community team until new moderators are found.

3

FCOTW: [email protected] (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 year ago by UlrikHD to c/community_showcase

1 comments fedilink

This weeks federated community of the week is gaming! This is a community for news, discussions and memes related to games

UlrikHD

Top Posts

Top Posts

Top Posts

Top Posts