Phoenix3875

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Haha, but it's really a pack of tools, more like a toolbox.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Now don't look at the lamp next to your sofa too closely.

 
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Your money at least.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

And that's why you don't see cooking mouse no more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

// TODO: Leave the code cleaner than you found

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

In recent git versions (>2.23), git restore and git restore --staged are the preferred ways to discard changes in the working tree (git checkout -- .) and staged changes (git reset --) respectively.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger.

——On the cruelty of really teaching computing science - E.W. Djikstra

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

The first rule of the Loaf Club…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

pelican noise

!!! Thank you for the bones !!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, I mean platforms accessible without so many hoops to jump through.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

It's believed that Glassdoor's business model is to charge companies for removing bad reviews. So how much value can the rating provide is questionable in the first place.

Personally, for big companies, there are always people writing their work experiences on an open platform. For small companies, it's unlikely to find a relevant review, if any, on Glassdoor anyway. So I never bothered to use it.

 

Coming from another country, I always wonder why the two utility companies I have here in the UK, Thames Water and Octopus Energy, would calculate an amount that they think I should pay monthly, instead of just charge whatever I used last month. To me, the latter way makes much more sense and is the standard practice in the countries I lived before.

The amount they calculated seems to generate either a huge credit balance, or a huge underestimation. Thames Water changed my monthly bill from £29 to £7, and then to £17 over the course of a year and a half. Octopus Energy built up more than £200 of a credit balance (not sure if it's a result of the UK government energy gift credit last winter), then set a minimal amount of £61 monthly. They say the purpose is to make sure that the credit balance would be always be more than £100. Okay...but why? If I want to save money, I'd go to a bank.

I could see that it might make sense if the measurement is not as easy or accurate, but come on, it's the 21st century and the meter shows me my energy usage by the hour, surely they can calculate the exact amount rather than pull a random number out of nowhere?

 

can be used as a bunker at war

 
 
 
 

It seems to be a bug for Firefox Android, but I had an empty space at the top when using wefwef as a PWA. Setting the toolbar position to "bottom" in the three-dot setting menu seems to fix it.

view more: next ›