jQuery was an essential stepping stone back when JS was lacking a ton of features that people take for granted these days.
Sure everything could have been done with Vanilla JS but it was verbose and difficult to follow. jQuery made it possible for any developer to quickly make a page dynamic
Yep. And three functions is better than one for legibility even if one would be fewer lines of code
Putting a dead character in a container and then yeeting that container into a chasm will no longer permanently destroy the character - they will now float around as a resurrectable Soul Echo as expected.
QA clearly wasn't good enough if they didn't pick up on such a game breaking bug prior to release
And...
If you dismiss your companion to camp and shove them into a chasm, Withers will now be able to resurrect them... so you can shove them into a chasm again, probably.
Whoever wrote these notes really deserves some credit
I think this might be what you're after
UI Improvements
Added a 'Delete all but latest' option for each campaign, so you can regain a little storage space wiggle room.
I never understand apps like this. Surely if you're looking for this level of feature you may as well just use a GUI?
That's usually the case but with this and the Rwanda proposal I think they're doing it because their voters enjoy the optics and indignity of migrants being treated as sub human.
It's fine. The cost of compensating victims is less than fixing the issue so yeah it's safe.
I used to see this a lot with Facebook. Every time they altered the design people would kick up a fuss and I never understood why, the new design always looked far better.
Nowadays of course I don't use Facebook but will occasionally have to sign in to look up the details of a business or something. The design has of course changed and I can't find a damn thing on it. So I'm finally on board with the masses.
But they aren't getting forced to change accounts. Their service continues just under another provider.
It'd be interesting to know how one way streets are counted
This was my experience too. At first I found code reviews to be an invaluable resource for improving my code. But I then reached a point where I'd learned everything I could from a particular reviewer.
I'd submit code that met every criteria, but the reviewer would still nit pick on tiny details that were entirely subjectective. It was no longer about the quality of code it became about the reviewer trying to put their mark on my work.
The only solution was to either ignore their nits or adopt the hairy arm technique whereby you include intentional errors for the reviewer to comment on so they feel their time had been valuable and you get away without yours being wasted.