my_hat_stinks

joined 2 years ago
[–] my_hat_stinks 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Uploading your consciousness to a machine wouldn't really extend your lifespan. Think of it like moving a file from one device to another; the file isn't actually moved, you just get a copy on the second device. You and your digital clone will also begin to diverge immediately as the lived experience of being a new digital entity would be different from continuing life as a meat person.

The closest you can get is to Ship of Theseus it; get a machine implant which gradually takes over brain functions as cells die or parts of the brain fail. Single stream of consciousness in a single body, now fully digitised. Incidentally this is also closer to biological processes to replace cells, though the brain cells renew much less frequently then other cell types. I think some areas don't naturally get replaced over a lifetime too but I'm not certain on that, either way you'd want to go faster than natural cell replacement.

Alternatively you could make the transfer process dissolve your meat brain. Personally I'd say you are dead and your clone lives on but its the same argument as Star Trek style transporters; the clone still feels like it's you so if they got to where you want to go does it really matter?

[–] my_hat_stinks 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Japanese, not Chinese. Probably not a literal translation, literal would be something like: here/at here (ここに, kokoni), rubbish (ゴミ, gomi), throw away do not (を捨てないで, o sutenaide), please (下さい, kudasai). Japan definitely does have access to translation services, speaking from experience if you walk up to a public help desk (eg at a train station) and you look foreign they'll whip out their phone to translate before you can even ask them anything.

[–] my_hat_stinks 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

A correct translation, sure, but that doesn't get you to "do not dumb".

[–] my_hat_stinks 5 points 5 days ago (5 children)

The translation was probably meant to be "do not dump", it's an anti-littering sign.

[–] my_hat_stinks 8 points 6 days ago

Sounds like the Milgram experiment. The gist is that participants were willing to administer ever-increasing shocks to another person up to lethal levels because an authority figure told them to.

[–] my_hat_stinks 1 points 1 week ago

If you want, I guess? Not a belief I hold personally, things I haven't seen are just things I haven't seen.

[–] my_hat_stinks 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Fair, but since I didn't see you in that kilt my statement still stands

[–] my_hat_stinks 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Definitely a skirt, not a kilt. Kilts are flat in front and pleated in the back/sides, usually with a sporran, and pretty much always tartan; the only time I've seen someone wear a solid-colour kilt is in pictures of Americans cosplaying with "tactical kilts".

[–] my_hat_stinks 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

You've just described spam. Mass unsolicited messaging.

[–] my_hat_stinks 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Either that's enough engagement so that's what they should have done instead of spam thousands of accounts or it's not enough engagement and they have no reason to spam thousands of accounts. You can't just decide to start spamming because you want more users in your new community.

[–] my_hat_stinks 6 points 1 week ago (11 children)

That makes no sense. The decision to close this community was made in a pinned post. If that's not enough engagement the community shouldn't have been closed.

[–] my_hat_stinks 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For many people, yes, there is no other choice. Was that meant to be a joke?

 
 
 
 
 
 
17
I don't exist (self.meta)
submitted 6 months ago by my_hat_stinks to c/meta
 

I signed in this morning and checked my profile to find I'm not actually here. Did anyone else accidentally stop existing overnight?

7
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by my_hat_stinks to c/meta
 

Not sure exactly how long this has been happening, but it's been bugging me for the last week at least.

Running Firefox 129.0 (64-bit) on Linux Mint, it seems like the login session is just constantly expiring. Every time I boot up my machine the first time I open programming.dev I have to sign in again. Closing all programming.dev tabs and navigating back to programming.dev without closing Firefox seems to always preserve the session and not require a new sign-in.

~~Closing all Firefox windows then opening Firefox and navigationg to programming.dev is a semi-reliable way to reproduce, about 75% of the time it requires a new sign-in even when I'd signed in less then a minute ago before closing the window.~~ Further testing shortly before submitting this post and those steps no longer reproduce the issue, I'm signed in even after closing the window. Maybe it's a recurring transient issue with login service?

Potentially relevant add-ons are UBlock Origin (0 blocks, shouldn't be an issue) and Privacy Badger (also 0 trackers blocked). I'm connected through VPN, but the issue seems to appear regardless of whether I stay on the same VPN server or switch servers. Firefox reports Content-Security-Policy issues but these seem unrelated and also appear when the session is successfully preserved.

Possibly helpful, occasionally when I open programming.dev I'll see it's signed out then automatically signs in after a second or so; this might have been a known Lemmy issue at some point with delayed authentication as a (now insufficient) solution. A good chance that's a dead-end, might be worth checking anyway.

Edit: It's worth noting that I'm also signed in via the android Jerboa app on another device and don't get signed out there. This could definitely be relevant if it turns out the Jerboa session somehow interferes with the Firefox session.

 
 
 
view more: next ›