this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
226 points (95.2% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4021 readers
685 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But how do you get the crewed aircraft to hold still long enough?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think we are going to be getting to a point where signal jamming is going to become a more critical part of warfare. A military base isn't going to allow any kind of transmission to occur nearby in order to protect itself.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is why laser targeting is a thing. Cant jam a laser beam.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

fiber optic drones (spool of fiber optic cable gets video signal from drone, and sends commands) is unjammable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Great way to paint yourself

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

smoke barriers has entered the discussion

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

slight breeze counters your defence

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What about those smoke machines from discos? Just put 5% of the military budget into permanent smoke generators. And of course additionally 2% for speakers to create a creepy ambiance

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

So THAT'S why the war simulator games from the early 2000s had all those fog of war simulations going! It wasn't rendering distance capabilities at all!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Drones could act as automated movable flack. Just get a bunch to get near the flight path and explode. There are definitely drones with a range way over 1 mile.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Or put some pieces of high-carbon steel/titanium on the drone and just let them get sucked into the intake.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The range needed could be 30.000 feet ...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the US arguably lost the VN war because they kept expecting the VK to fight like the US

why would you try to counter the jet at 30k feet?

a jet takes so long to build and so much to maintain the supply chain is super vulnerable

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Making a cloud of drone flak is very cheap and easy and can take out multiple types of threats. They talk to each other and act as a redundant pinpoint targeting system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Boom a cheap EMP blast takes out all your 700 drones.

It's a never ending battle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Faraday cages on the drones electronics. Battle continues

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bigger more expensive EMP burns through your more expensive MYLAR caged drones.

Battle continues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bigger faraday cage and larger battery

Battle continues

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The drones are now the size of the fighter jets 🤔

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

The fighter jets now have to get more EMP protection too, and ate gitting bigger.

The fight continues

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

what kind of up time do they have

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I imagine a drone built for this could be an hour or two as some return to charge periodically on specific areas under protection.