starman

There is a difference between well-written female characters that also happen to be strong vs hollow, soulless, undeveloped charachters whose only defining feature is being a "strong female character".

See the difference beetween Ellen Ripley, Sarah Connor, Leia, Padme, Rita Vrataski, Gamora, Nebula, Naomi Nagata[1], and so on vs Galadriel (rings of power), Capitan Marvel, Ironhearth (MCU), She-hulk and whatever happened in Star Wars Acolyte (I could go on like this for a long time, but I think that you get what I mean already).

[1] I even included modern examples, to highlight that it's not old good, new bad

Thanks for explanation.

high jacked by sexist dudes who see “taking the red pill” as waking up to (perceived) social injustice against men

l just never seen it in this context.

redpill?

What a hypocrite. You're talking about trust and saying things like this?!

E

The first successful transfection of designed mRNA packaged within a liposomal nanoparticle into a cell was published in 1989. "Naked" (or unprotected) lab-made mRNA was injected a year later into the muscle of mice.

But on the other hand, first human test was in 2001

Yeah, I was thinking about it and then asked here. It seems like most of nice stuff was invented in the 19st century, and in the past 24 years we just improve it.

Still not as good as native package

Looks like C# 12 interceptors:

[InterceptsLocation(@"C:\testapp\Program.cs", line: 4, column: 5)]

I know it looks awful, but it's not intended for direct use, but rather for source generators for native ahead of time compilation.

https://andrewlock.net/exploring-the-dotnet-8-preview-changing-method-calls-with-interceptors/

It doesn't make a big difference. You are going to send emails to Gmail most of the time anyway.

Come on, it's just a funny greentext.

Sorry, I forgot to add post body to this crosspoint. See edit.

Firefox?