duringoverflow

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This will greatly enhance the intelligence of future generations and make education accessible to almost everyone on earth at a similar high level.

I don't think that accessibility in AI somehow correlates with the intelligence of the subjects using it. It can actually work in the completely opposite way where people blindly trust it or people get used to using it in a degree that they're unable to do anything without the help from the technology. Like people who are unable to navigate 2 blocks from their house if they don't use google maps navigation even though they do the same route every day.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

If large companies and influential people move to Mastodon [...] and no ads.

large companies and influential people are in the commercial platforms because of the ads. There is literally no reason for them to move in a place without ads.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

while I would say I belong to the dark-theme cult, there are some applications/websites that I cannot get used to them in dark mode. Like github or slack for example in which everything else than they light theme looks strange in my eyes.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

meta (threads) will not support fediverse already. They said they will do in some later version. So for the completely practical part, you don't need to do anything right now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it depends what you consider as consequence. For me, setting up a clear boundary between what is now known as fediverse and whatever it is this that meta will create is not consequence but choice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

in this case we don't talk about users who want to block users of another instance. The problem is not the users of meta. The problem is meta itself and all the problems it will bring to the federated network. Whoever cannot see that their intentions are not to promote federated networks but to exploit and extinguish them, is just naive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Am I just misunderstanding this?

yes

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

meta is not here to promote open networks. They will do more harm than good. If you want to learn more about how google achieved it with the XMPP you can read the story here https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html written by one of the core developers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

since I missed part of the announcements, did they defederated completely? Aka removed themselves from the federated network. I thought they had started just blocklisting instances. I guess I'm wrong (?)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

exactly. However people tend to believe that the AI slipped and admitted by mistake that it do have an account and then it tried to hide it again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this seems so messed up. I like kbin, don't get me wrong, but I consider this to be a bug, not a feature. When you have upvotes and downvotes one next to the other, you (a user) expect these 2 to do the exactly opposite action. Not one of them just add something in your favourites while the other starts negating another user's karma.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

you missed the point where the open source devs were in a constant race to adapt to all the google-"innovations" and actually troubleshoot on them which ends up demotivating

view more: next ›