this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
21 points (78.4% liked)

Programming

17474 readers
260 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't know why but for some reasons I cannot take people seriously that write articles about the importance of their role.

In the media, CTOs are often portrayed as tech geniuses or wizards, single-handedly coding complex algorithms or inventing groundbreaking technologies.

Not sure what kind of media the author of this articles (op?) consumes, but I don't know anybody who thinks something like that.

[–] tatterdemalion 2 points 1 year ago

Definitely hyperbole, but it's not uncommon for CTOs to be the main author of a company's tech.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Somehow I get the sense that humility and authenticity aren’t required skills

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Those aren’t required for the rest of the C Suite, why would CTO be different?

[–] nibblebit 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a bit of a narrow view of a very vague term. Having worked with many different sizes of organisations i can say that the responsibilities of whomever is labelled CTO are completely arbitrary. The only thing you can establish is that they are the person accountable for the technology decisions.

Sometimes that's a legacy developer, sometimes that's the first sys-admin.

Sometimes it's the VP of engineering.

Sometimes that's the person that maintains the best relationships with software vendors.

Sometimes it's the person that was hired externally to explain the tech to the CEO and let's them make informed executive decisions.

Sometimes it's just a public figure used to promote the org and maybe do DevRel.

Sometimes it's the Architect that designed the ecosystem.

Sometimes it's the ancient programmer that has kidnapped the entire codebase so that no-one else can sanely work on it.

Sometimes it's a six sigma type that setup the ticketing system, PRs and the release process.

At any size, the CTO is whatever the org needs him to be at that point.

[–] firelizzard 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That first paragraph is basically my job now, except for the investors and clients part. We have an actual CTO so he gets to deal with all that crap and I can focus on the tech stuff.

[–] colorado 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] firelizzard 3 points 1 year ago

He also talks to investors and clients, but about business focused subjects vs tech focused subjects. Beyond that I'm fairly vague on what he does but I'm happy with that because it means I can keep my focus (mostly) on what I find interesting.