this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
68 points (75.0% liked)

Asklemmy

45225 readers
909 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know if I'm going crazy but looking at the current situation in the world ... please tell me that I'm overexagurating

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 month ago (3 children)

please tell me that I’m overexagurating

You're overexaggerating.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Mach mal nicht so'n Fass auf.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Einfach locker durch die Hose atmen.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Man kann jetzt noch schneller ekk'n

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

Nah, there won't be WW3. Instead we get countries sabotaging each other via hacking critical infrastructure, proxy wars, propaganda, trade wars.

I doubt there will ever be a direct "hot war" between the top five nuclear powers ever again.

WW3 is not what's gonna kill people, climate change is more likely gonna be humanity's downfall.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No. It’s bad for the economy.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The number one thing I've learned through the last several decades is that if it's bad for the economy, no one will do it. Greed is the number one driver of everything right now. Maybe that will change, but I doubt it. Look at all the positive progress we try to make, it's stopped the second anyone rich would lose any money.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You could not be more wrong

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's bad for certain parts of the economy and it is dangerous for current rulers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Economy is cyclical, always either heading into a recession or coming out of a recession. A capitalist society requires constant money flow for expansion which is why interest rates are lowered during recessive times to stimulate expenditure and raised during peak to control expansion. World wars put spending into overdrive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

To the wealthy, volatility is opportunity. Yeah, the market will go down for a while, and later it'll go back up. Billionaires will cash in both ways.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

The situation today is nowhere near as bad as the Cold War.

Think of it this way. All of the 0.01%ers in china, USA and Russia share the same tastes and values. Think any of them are really hot to blow up their nice places on the Rivera?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Could already be going. We didn't name them World War 1 and World War 2 until after they were over

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I’d tend to agree. The war is digital and economic. Countries are hacking each other’s infrastructure and commercial systems, mass propaganda and spying with troll farms, tiktok and even hardware. Plenty of fighting with sanctions, tariffs, bans of sales of technology.

Fighting for land right now is really unnecessary, however depending on how well humanity survives climate change I’d expect to see some arguments going in to drilling and mining places like Greenland, the arctic and antarctic. China is already setting up shop in Antarctica.

We are also all tied together economically in so many different ways that a war between major powers would be economically devastating for everyone before the first shot is fired, particularly for the countries that ceded most of their production to other countries that might be hostile in war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've been expecting WW3 since 1983.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Only Wiseman in the thread.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In 2001 there was that 9/11 thing and it sounded like WW3 had just started. Turns out, it didn't. Well, lots of things did happen as a result of it, but WW3 wasn't one of them. Soon after that, USA was involved in a number of wars in the middle east and it felt like WW3 had just started. Again, it didn't. Some time around 2010s the tension between North Korea and South Korea was getting pretty intense, and a friend of mine started talking WW3... As usual, WW3 didn't start.

At the moment, the situation in Ukraine feels just like all the other major incidents, but we'll see how it works out. If you expose your mind to tabloid journalism, it begins to feel like the entire world is about to explode. History has a tendency of repeating itself, so I suggest reading about the things that lead to WW1 and WW2. Once, you've done that, you'll begin to pay attention to certain signs and start ignoring most of the nonsense tabloids keep writing about.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's just survivorship bias, you didn't live through the worlds where all those things escalated into flat out war, you dimension skipping hippie.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’m a very picky hippie when it comes to dimensions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

It's reminiscent of the cold war.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

According to the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, we are closer to nuclear war now than ever in history. Closer than when boomers were doing school duck and cover drills.

2024 Doomsday Clock Statement: A moment of historic danger: It is still 90 seconds to midnight

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (26 children)

I think that the true world war 3 will not be nations against nations, but citizens against their own nations. The stage is set for an actual paradigm shift or system annihilation. We will not support civilization if it doesn't change, either the people destroy the pyramid or the pyramid will destroy the world.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

No thanks. Appreciate the offer though, very kind of you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't think so.

Primarily because there's not economic benefit in it for the ruling class.

Also, we've made the experience of the war in the middle east around 2000 where the USA couldn't even occupy a farmer's state for more than a couple years.

I don't think anybody realistically thinks they can take over another (big) country in this time.

[–] con_fig 9 points 1 month ago

Famously the same was said about WWI re the economic benefit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Primarily because there’s not economic benefit in it for the ruling class.

Our history of perpetual war seems to disprove this

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Star Trek says that we shouldn't expect World War 3 until 2026, so we've got 1 more year to live to the fullest before then.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

No.

Russia (the current primary aggressor) is on the brink of a banking system collapse. It doesn't have the money to wage war on a bigger scale than it already is.

China is far more interested in trade than hostilities.

The middle east has been a tinder box for over a hundred years. I don't see it dragging outsiders into it and hopefully we have a respite coming.

Central Asia has tension between India and Pakistan, but that's nothing new. India could piss off China or the reverse, and if that kicked off the loss of life could be on a scale that would be unprecedented but still I think it wouldn't drag the west in.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

The US has joined the party

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

It feels like youre avoiding mentioning the most warmonger country in history πŸ˜…

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

When Trump was elected again I spent about 3 weeks living with an existential dread I've never in my life felt before.

Whenever it happens, it is coming.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Anything could happen of course, but I don't see this as a likely scenario myself. What's more likely is that we return to bloc competition similar to what we saw during the Cold War. Except this time it's going to be G7 against the BRICS.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I think it has already started. It just hasn't consolidated yet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

So, WW3 won't happen until the oligarchy says it's time. Not sure why now would be the time, but I suppose it could be. There's like a billion people in the world making a dollar a day, a few billion people only making a few dollars a day... That's a few billion dollars per day the oligarchy almost certainly thinks belongs in their pocket instead. So I could see them continuing to squeeze the world for every last drop of wealth, which I think will cause unrest in a lot of places. Add climate change to that and I think things just get bad everywhere for most people. Obviously the oligarchy will just go to their islands, yachts, bunkers until a few billion are dead and they can pop back out with their private armies ready to "save" the world.

A lot of people think they need us to buy their trinkets, but the entire consumer middle class is only like 100 years old, and I think was only designed to keep us distracted while they plundered the world. Now that a small handful of people own everything, and soon enough robots and AI will replace most human labor, it's mission accomplished and we can go back to feudalism where they are gods and everyone else is slaves.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You never really know, it's plausible. But I doubt it. It doesn't seem any more likely now than it did in 2016.

Ceasefire in Gaza for a minimum of 6 weeks (if I understood the news correctly) is huge. That conflict might be close to over if we're lucky.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're not overexagerating, the property crisis in the imperial core is becoming so severe that there are only 2 solutions, either the people rebel against its ruling class or they side with them and engage in yet another settler project. In my honest opinion, the latter seems like the most probably outcome, its already very advanced in Palestine and its starting in Syria.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί