gandalf_der_12te

joined 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

So yes, increasing shareholder value is enshrined in US law. Only private corporations can get around that rule.

This is true, with one exception.

There are non-profit corporations. They have to declare that they are non-profit at the time of foundation, though. They have to write that in the statute (idk what it's called in English, it's "Satzung" in German).

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago

No, I was arguing in good faith; But I see it doesn't resonate with you at all, so i'll just leave it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

tbh, that's a fair question. I would have asked them same thing, if only to hope you'd say something like:

"What, no. The horses didn't die. It was a movie. They pretended to kill them."

Especially if you're already emotionally worked up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

That's called "being caught off guard".

Or maybe she was just messing with him, who knows.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I wonder: Is there any experiment done on Mars that uses Spectroscopy to detect water?

I'm thinking of something like this:

Due to Absorbance, wet air should absorb specific frequencies of light.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

three, on three different instances. It's called redundancy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Well, what we need is some dedicated non-profit company making chips.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Danke, das sage ich auch.

Der Wartungsaufwand, wenn man die TLD .org wählt, steigt mmn sehr stark an. Ideal wäre wohl .dach, aber das gibt es leider nicht. Daher schlage ich .at vor.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Two plates of rice or noodles with vegetables and salmon. Delicious. Actually, highest ROI that you could possibly hope to achieve in the universe.

343
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Edit:

This is not intended as "how to grow all your food you ever need at home".

It merely provides the vegetables.

You still have to get your grains (and therefore the majority of your calories) from somewhere else.

geteilt von: https://lemmy.ca/post/22193783

14
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hey there ;-)

These are my own thoughts about the US-China PV trade tariffs.

My goal is to point out how solar installations are a good thing. And US should lower tariffs on PV imports.

Here are my points:

  • National security:

It has been argued that by relying on Chinese solar panel imports, the US makes itself dependent on China in a critical part of the economy.

I disagree with this point of view:

Solar panels are a very durable product, and once installed, can last easily for 20+ years. There is no urgent, or immediate need to replace them, in case a US-China war breaks out. Therefore, the US does not make itself more dependent on China energy-wise by importing solar panels.

Actually, quite the opposite is the case IMO:

In case WW3 breaks out (let's hope not but what if), then the US would be vulnerable by being dependent on fossil fuel imports that have to be shipped daily, or at least, regularly. By installing solar panels, they do no longer depend on recurring, regular imports. (Because solar panels only have to be imported once, not regularly).

  • Economic arguments:

It is argued that by fostering the domestic solar panel production capability within the US, that could drastically make the domestic economy grow. It has been argued that instating tariffs on Chinese solar panel imports, and using the so-collected tariff money to subsidize the domestic solar panel market, would foster that goal.

I want to show that, while this is true, also the opposite is true:

Lowering tariffs has the consequence of providing even cheaper energy to the domestic economy, thus making all production (and therefore virtually every product in the market) cheaper, which stimulates the economy and increases the economy overall (price elasticity).

So we have to compare the economic benefit of producing solar panels domestically, against the economic boost that cheaper energy provides. I would say (due to my gut feeling) that the second clearly outweighs the first, so the economy actually profits in total, if solar panel tariffs are dropped, because energy becomes cheaper and stimulates the economy.

Edit:

To the downvoter(s), please explain why you disagree. Or is it just not the appropriate place to discuss these things? If so, where would be a better place?

 

geteilt von: https://lemmit.online/post/3018791

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ProgrammerHumor by /u/polytopelover on 2024-05-26 21:23:20+00:00.

 
142
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Other example would be "all men have penis". Accusing someone for "faking their identity".

view more: next ›