this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
343 points (97.2% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2271 readers
648 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why billionaires shouldn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

If only someone would make them not exist.

Elon’s a pretty public guy, right?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago

Mmm,

Mmhmm

Oh

Musk's actions and expressed views have made him a polarizing figure. He has been criticized for making unscientific and misleading statements, including COVID-19 misinformation; affirming antisemitic and transphobic comments, and promoting conspiracy theories. His ownership of Twitter has been controversial because of the layoffs of a large number of employees, an increase in posts containing hate speech, misinformation and disinformation on the website, and changes to website features, including verification.

Ah, that’s probably why. People are allowed to expose him without being censored on wiki.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

FYI, Elon, you can't sue for libel/slander if what people are saying is actually true.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

You can if you change the definition of libel (or terrorism) to be ‘anything that negatively affects an ultra rich person’. Which is what is happening before our very eyes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can. You can sue for any reason that you can dream up. True, a lot of those suits would get thrown out on a motion for summary judgement, but a libel suit would likely pass the test of a prima facie valid case, and the case would proceed. Now, if the facts don't support it, then you'd lose, but if you have a lot more money than the defendant, you can use procedure to bury them financially.

It's one of the major flaws in the U.S. legal system, and anti-SLAPP laws are far too weak, since they usually rely on the defendant to try to enforce them.

Look at what happened with ABC News, recently.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

That's why I like Australia's system of having to pay the defendants fees if you lose.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I actually wasn't going to donate to Wikipedia this year because I'm pretty strapped but fuck it. I'm donating more than I did last year I can put more stuff on a credit card this season instead.

Fuck Elon Musk. And fuck anyone who buys his stupid fucking cars.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Right on. Consider also contributing to an article. Volunteers work tirelessly to filter the misinformation pushed by stakeholders like Elon Musk and the army he can afford to employ to fuck up articles full-time.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Thanks for donating! I give annually too. But we’re going to have to step up our contributions, both financially and in terms of information, if we want to keep Wikipedia a resource for free information and not free propaganda. Megacorps like EM’s and their lobbyists are always fucking up articles, trying to outpace the volunteers who vet the information.

Just look at the Consumer Brands Association or the National Restaurant Association (the lobbying groups who are responsible for suppressing ultra-processed food regulation and fair wage legislation). Among their claims on the Wikipedia pages are that Michelle Obama “asked for their help” for her healthy eating campaign and that they exist to encourage responsible food selection by consumers— referring to sources that are actually about MO issuing a warning to them to improve food labels or else.

Another example is the Scientology page which has been locked due to the relentless efforts of Scientologists constantly trying to edit it with misinformation. Maintaining the integrity of the platform is really a tireless service that volunteers of Wikipedia Foundation provide.

For those who may not be able to donate or want to take additional steps to protect the freedom of shared information, consider contributing to an article you’re passionate about. Platforms like Udemy and Coursera offer free courses on how to research and verify information effectively. While I’ve always been a strong advocate for public libraries, it’s clear that Wikipedia is the essential resource when it comes to current and accessible knowledge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Donated as well. Fuck Musk.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

So I just donated to Wikipedia.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I donated to Wikipedia for the first time because fuck that guy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ll donate, once they start blocking corporate and government contributors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It's hard, however, to deal with people acting as individuals who just happen to be paid by Apartheid Manchild to write or edit articles slanted to his fucked-up worldview.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

i don't get what problem you would have about "bias" over wikipedia if you care about the truth and facts.

just kind of exposes what it's really about for musk.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Now they're openly admiting that they're against everything that makes the live better for everyone? Has the brainwashing succeeded?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

A better life is a "woke" idea.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Now they’re openly admiting that they’re against everything that makes the live better for everyone?

always have been

[–] [email protected] 189 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I'm kinda in awe how Elon finds every day new ways to be a utter and complete piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 days ago

I'm not, only because I've never once been in awe of any damn thing that piece of shit has ever ~~done~~ stolen credit for, and don't intend to start now.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Tbf, if it is true, it is kinda ridiculous they spend 29℅ of their budget on DEI nonsense. They should use their donations for keeping up the infrastructure and maybe rewarding high-quality editors. Kinda tells me they are doing very well financially and I'm better off supporting other projects.

Musk can still go fuck himself.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (5 children)

"Wikipedia is built on the premise that it becomes better when more people of different backgrounds—including political persuasions—source, edit, curate and research content. Our equity goal advances that. The 'Safety & Inclusion' goal (now titled 'Safety & Integrity' in our 2024-2025 plan) is focused on ensuring that people are able to freely access and safely contribute to knowledge on Wikipedia in a changing legal and policy environment globally."

Magoo: RAAAAGGGGEEEEE!!! WHITE CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS are the only REAL people!! WE'RE the only people that matter!!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 89 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Can somebody take aim on his head finally?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Won't somebody rid us of this meddlesome billionaire?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago

TBH i think we need Mario for this one

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Time to annually donate to wikipedia.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fourth most visited site in the world.. he wants to install ads on it and own it.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago

(and control what it says)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 days ago

Crowdsourced information does put a bit of a damper on the whole “history written by the victors” thing.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago

Well, I hate to admit it, but I've never donated to Wikipedia.

But this just made me set up a recurring donation. Streisand effect sorta, I guess.

Fuck Elon Musk.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 days ago

Elon takes aim and the media are right there to make his job easier. Thank goodness there's reporting on everything he wants.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I donate $20 every year, but I also donate again whenever this goof makes headlines going after Wikipedia. Feels good. Fuck you, cunt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago

Guy who owns biased platform claims other platform that has negative views on him is biased. Someone tell Elon that if he donates enough he can have controlling shares of Wiki. He can't, but he doesn't have to know that.

load more comments
view more: next ›