2.7%
I thought they were talking about something like 10%. Title seems overblown and just bait to get readers to read about something completely unrelated.
We definitely are far away from trusting robots to do that kind of stuff. I wouldn't even let it declare my taxes.
Is this article written by AI? It jumps all over the place and doesn't seem coherent.
Piracy isn't only torrenting. Speeds are better on TOR than I2P, so streaming websites could host the data and allow users to download it directly (DDL). They could also be on TOR and I2P, then provide the DDLs on TOR and torrents on I2P - the best of both worlds.
I bet this won't have an impact on memory safety and interop means C++ compilers have to be stricter about memory layout and reduce unspecified edge cases.
If all this piracy were running on anonymized networks like TOR or I2P, they'd have a much harder time taking down stuff and censoring it.
The U.S destroying its own economy. Who could've asked for a better Christmas present? With Trump at the helm next year, it's only a question of time before trade partners tell the U.S to fuck off and they stop ignoring decisions like these.
Competition is nice, but I would've hoped it would be RISC-V competition. Amazon competition just means yet another way to do things that have to be compiled for.
I'm actually surprised there is no specification. It's how I thought languages were written: spec first, implementation later. Do RFCs serve this purpose?
That's pretty cool, but terrifying as well. Can't wait for somebody to go a step further and start writing proc macros (call it rusht) to replace bash scripts with rust scripts. Actually, now that I think about it, not so terrifying. They can probably be debugged better, could be safer (unless someone starts publishing malicious proc macros), allow dependencies to be added to compose better scripts without relying on they system's package manager, and so much more.
It has many upsides like every page being a markdown file, the interface is nice and easy to use, it supports embedding files images, videos, diagrams and PDFs, highlighting PDFs and referring to the highlights, saved searches (e.g all tasks about "life", pages about science and " forum responses", ...), and I'm probably forgetting a few. It even has a mobile app that's works quite well.
The downside however is that it's all in some functional language transpiled into JavaScript to run in electron. There's no CLI to take a directory and spit out HTML files to host your notes, "automation" means downloading and running the electron app, then interacting with an API that controls electron and simulates clicking. It's amongst the worst solutions I've seen for automation and I'm not sure why they built the application this way. And because it's an electron app, there are unnecessary difficulties on read-only system partitions / atomic operating systems. Finally, though opensource, they have a Contributor Licence Agreement (CLA).
My fear is that there will be a rugpull at some point in the future and I'll have to find an alternative solution, so right now I'm on the (passive) lookout for opensource alternatives with mobile apps. Found nothing yet and I don't want to start developing one myself (no time).
Holy shit. Are they generating documentation or a game?
Looks like the announcement was written by somebody from the US and the picture made by somebody non-US.
Anti Commercial-AI license