melvisntnormal

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I still see it sometimes when connecting my Steam Deck to my TV

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

[update: this was a misunderstanding]

Here's the update for convenience

(... saw this on my feed, only just thought to check the community itself to see if there was another post, my bad)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

P E R S O N A 🔫

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Also from the UK (also Manchester actually, literally on the Metrolink right now). I also have no idea what that person said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

In the UK, generally chosen by party membership. There's been some experiments with open primaries, but nothing really substantial.

It's probably worth mentioning that, because the timings of our elections are generally left to the whim of the Prime Minister, candidates are normally elected by the party way in advance so they're ready just in case anything happens. Our election cycles also usually last only six weeks, which isn't enough time to run an internal election and then campaign.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Fun fact: the Tories actually experimented with open primaries in some constituencies. I don't expect that to last though

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Put a slash before the dot, like 5\.:

5. Go straight to jail.

This is a Markdown issue really. Starting a line with a number and then a dot turns that line into an item in an ordered list. The most common behaviour (that I've seen) is to start that list from 1, regardless of what number is used. The intent is to make it easy to add items later without renumbering everything, for living documents at least.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Where was suicide mentioned?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Morgana

Only if I can still decide when I go to sleep

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I find it kinda ironic that they communicate over Discord, but it looks interesting

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I'm not saying the popular vote is more valid than the constituency-based system. I'm saying there's more nuance to the situation than "the population wanted Brexit because the Tories got a majority", which is what I thought you were sayin here:

Also, as I recall, there were two elections after the referendum in which UK citizens doubled-down on Brexit by returning the Conservatives to government with landslide victories.

...

In any case, with such sustained support for the Tories post-referendum, it's hard to lay the blame for Brexit at anyone's feet except the UK citizenry itself.

I can't deny the last sentence, but using the election as evidence makes it sound like over half of the country wanted the Conservatives in power, which is demonstrably untrue, that's the only thing I'm arguing against.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

While I see your point, I feel like this doesn't take into account how our voting system can give a party a large majority even if less than half the population votes for them. Just over half the population voted for parties that weren't pro-hard Brexit, yes the Tories got 56% of the seats on just 42% of the vote. That kind of discrepancy means it's hard to infer the will of the people based on the composition of the Commons.

view more: next ›