Here I am, sitting in the south of Antarctica believing I'm lucky because finally I might have some good latency. Too good to be true.
mckean
joined 1 year ago
So basically you can take advantage of the nice people in the first round of every game... Play multiple games with many people and become an evil billionaire.
Halo's principle
I believe he will rip off his head and shit down his neck...
We definitely will not...
They probably didn't have their phone numbers...
There's no positive or negative, just share (width). It is done creatively but still accurately, it looks like the most dominant segment takes the center allowing you to easily spot which was the most popular at what year.
Such nonsense. If you are privacy conscious you may understand what the implications are of using said service. I'm confident one is able to use various Google services in a way that allows you to be in control about what you want to share.
What's that monitor on the right? Neat aspect ratio...
I think calling one way better than the other is flawed. The reason the title is saying that tabs are objectively better is because they are used in addition to where spaces are used elsewhere. You could make the same argument in favor spaces due to keeping things simpler.
The argument of having variable indent size for tabs so viewers can decide how big they are is imho legitimate but also not the goal as it's addressing something that teams generally agree on. There is max characters per line, brace placement, general code style and rules. Yes we can eject the indentation from the rules that are agreed on but once again simplicity over complexity has an equal say.
In the end it doesn't matter that much, a good programmer will be able to work in either setting, the Editor will do most of the work anyways.
With all that said, spaces all the way!
It was pointed out that the first price was higher originally. The funny thing is that in that case the price of four would be nice to know. With the given information it would be economically more efficient to buy two times two if you wanted four vs one times three and then an additional one.