flop_leash_973

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Amazing that they can't seem to see that they are not going to win any customers by trying to out Apple Apple.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

I'm sure the bears would allow you to attend, as the meal.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago

Sounds like they are just pissed that he found a way to beat them at their own game.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yet another thing we have entire books and movie series about what will go wrong, and probably how. Yet somehow a way will be found to make it go wrong in exactly those ways.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

As the customer, which in a practical sense is the only perspective that matters to me day-to-day, Epic offers me nothing close to what Steam or GOG can give me. Hell, even EA's and Ubisofts launchers were more useful since they at least had exclusives. All Epic has is Fortnite and for someone like myself that doesn't care for that kind of game, there is no reason to even consider their platform for anything.

And given my recent switch away from Windows and to Linux full time on my gaming PC to put a further wedge between me and the things Microsoft has been doing with Windows that I don't like that is a good thing given Epics history of embracing things that will never work as smoothly on Linux as Steam games do with Proton or GOG's native Linux options do.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Naturally the price for the cheapest model will also be going to up several orders of magnitude more than the cost of materials, labor, and healthy profit margin to account for that as well I'm sure.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Someone found something that still depends on the control panel that will not be easily moved or done away with I bet.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

"Fringe" ideas are discovered to be fact a lot of the time. Nearly everything that is known to the true in the modern world started out as "some quack theory".

The difference is in how those that think of the "quack theory" go about investigating their theory and respond to the results of that investigation. And whether someone responds honestly or not to that has a lot more to do with them as a person than it does what field of study they come from.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Musk is learning the lesson Google and Youtube learned years ago with the "adpocalypse". If the whole house of cards depends on ad dollars you have to keep them happy.

Unless Musk is going to take X (Twitter) completely subscription only, or fund it exclusively out of his own pocket, he is not going to get that "anything I want goes" utopia he keeps crowing about.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

That stance will change if they ever get acquired. Might even get the chance to see James Cuda try and walk back this stance in a few years.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 3 weeks ago (71 children)

I personally think the whole backlash against master/slave in the computing world is people looking for something in their sphere of knowledge to be offended about so they can feel like they are part of "a movement". Even if some mustache twirling racist was the first "computer guy" to come up with the term and meant it to be offensive, that is not how sane people view it today. So some of the advocates for changing it should stop trying to build it up into some Pizzagate-like conspiracy against black/brown people.

Having said that, I also don't have any strong attachments to the phrasing either. Phase it out in favor of something that makes everyone happy if that keeps the peace. It is just a term that made sense at the time to describe something. There is nothing stopping us from changing it to something else now if we so choose. It is not erasing heritage or some such nonsense. If anything, people having strong hangups about it if there are better or equally as good terms out there that doesn't make people uncomfortable is far weirder in my opinion.

The only thing I have somewhat strong opinions about is making it some high priority to go back and erase those terms from solutions that already exist. Change them as you update things, sure, but why create extra work to update something old that is currently working if the only change is not functional and just verbiage. Seems like wasted effort that could be better directed and solving functional issues to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Because the know the people that buy it either are stupid or have no choice (in the cases of the few that actually have to eat those kinds of diets for health reasons).

 

It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

833
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Jesus, that is a gross way to inject advertising into turn-by-turn navigation.

Edit/update from 9to5google so this post does not spread what is apparently inaccurate information: https://9to5google.com/2024/07/08/google-maps-pop-up-quick-detour-ad/

 

It is hard to imagine that there was not someone inside of Nike that lost their faith in humanity when the pitch for these things was originally taking off.

 

Well, at least they aren't outright throwing the functionality in the trash.

 

I can't imagine anyone that has decent prospects would agree to go back to Tesla after getting canned with those kinds of wild swings in decision making.

 

As if the Prime Video app couldn't get any worse.

view more: next ›