HeckingShepherd

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I can afford it and use it all the time. It’s completely unreasonable to expect a company to provide a service for you for free without any way for them to monetize you. Hosting videos isn’t free so why should they pay for you to have access to their service

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Only those who have beaten the Pokémon league can be digimon. Because in order to be a digimon you must be the champion

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t the Sony flagship like 2k? From everything I have heard it’s a pretty niche phone mainly for people who know how to get the most out of their Camera by manually adjusting settings. I get wanting a headphone jack but having to use an adapter isn’t worth spending an extra $600

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they changed that so it doesn’t work anymore

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Big desks and room to put them are also expensive

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No one is chaotic good because they want to be. We are chaotic good because 2 good monitors is expensive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Had mine happen while I put it in a box to move desks. Was a pain to untangle

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think speed limits are a little lower on average. Definitely surprised at the size of the difference as well though

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t that be your feet? As long as it’s not one of the sides so you don’t roll off I think it’s fine

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I agree CEO compensation is really messed up but I don’t thinks it’s really relevant. A company gets to decide how much they value labour and if someone’s work isn’t enough to justify paying them they simply won’t have a job. I know it’s awful to pay less than a living wage but it’s important to remember these people are almost universally living with their family or in group homes. The options are really only either they don’t work or they work with a company paying less than minimum wage. Obviously the government subsidizing the wages is an option but I’m not sure if that’s the best use of resources. Would it not make more sense to directly subsidize families and group homes based on economic need.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (20 children)

I think for a lot of people it’s about having some place to go during the day that they don’t have to pay for. If someone is unable to work a regular minimum wage job but is able to do simple tasks it could be either be stay at home and do nothing everyday or having either the government or the family pay for care. This allows a company to provide the supervision and a place for safe social interaction. People in these programs get to feel like an actual member of society rather than just a burden on their family. They can have something to do all day and come home and talk about their day at work instead of what they watched on TV. It’s unfortunate that they can’t provide enough value to justify a company to pay minimum wage but at least this way they get to have some money to help their family with bills or spend on their hobbies.

view more: next ›