FizzyOrange

Yeah so far it seems to be stronger than steel in the same way that glass is. Where can I buy some graphene wire?

I have yet to read an "as strong as / stronger than steel" that wasn't bullshit in some way.

You know what's stronger than steel? Glass. Ordinary glass. Yeah that's how they trick you.

Simplicity is definitely something to be valued, but for some reason Linux people equate "just a few shell scripts" with simplicity.

Sure there might not be much there, and maybe if you read all of those scripts you can understand them. But I don't want to have to read and manually maintain the shell scripts of my init system. That isn't simple for normal users. Simple is when the OS actually works reliably, and shell scripts are the antithesis of reliability.

Definitely Teams.

I don't understand. Why would I tape ctrl down?

It can definitely handle some routine low-risk tasks. I've used it for that.

But I also haven't ever worked anywhere where graduates are only given routine low-risk tasks. Does that really happen? In places I've worked they are given non-routine tasks that are probably slightly less complex - in particular not requiring architecting a new system - but not like "reformat this file" or "write a script to clean up my git branches" or whatever.

I would guess this is really unrelated to AI. In fact the graph kind of shows that.

I've always heard Teams is crap but I've never used it. My company is switching to it though. What crap things do I have to look forward to?

I agree. I think it's driven by fear. I get it. I'm slightly afraid I won't have a job in 10 years (or at least a much worse paying one)...

I'm still a much better programmer than AI today. But I don't cope with the fear by deluding myself into thinking that AI is useless and will stay useless.

The feels a lot like portrait painters saying that photography will never amount to anything because it's blurry and black and white.

• Free CI
• Everyone else also uses GitHub

Wake me up when there's a competitor that can match that.

Presumably because Forgejo didn't have CI support until extremely recently. And because Jenkins is trash.

Depends what it's for. I think a simple CLI text editor like this probably shouldn't have any smarts. Obviously an IDE like VSCode or IntelliJ should.

It's not quite that bad. They say

This means that we cannot accept any changes based on the GNU source code.

You are totally allowed to look at it. For example if there was some weird behaviour that you couldn't work out, you could look at the GNU code to understand it.

What you can't do is closely base your code on the GNU code. I.e. you can't just translate it from C into Rust.