this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
406 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
13 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] onlinepersona 49 points 11 months ago (4 children)

After what the USAians achieved with a net positive output, hopefully they can match and surpass that. Fusion is one of the few technologies that can get us to 1 on Kardashev scale.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

Ok but what if coal powered space craft?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd rather not suffocate lol

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Get marketing to convince the rich folk it is an "activated charcoal" infused air

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

But coal workers are a bedrock of American ideals! We can't take their jobs!

Is a /s needed? I don't know anymore. Do people really enjoy being coal miners and want their children to follow that wonderful career? I can get a yes to that question but only from people who have no idea what that entails.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

-Musk, "Get your shovels ready lads, we are going to Mars!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Too low fuel density to work id assume, and most engine designs expect a liquid fuel

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

USAians

The level of laziness here is inspiring lmao. I'm going to use this from now on

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What Kardashians have to do with it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

The method they used is absolutely unsuited for power generation, they're doing weapons research. Two things:

  1. Sure, more energy came out than hit the target but the amount of power wasted generating the laser light is right-out astronomical. People also gripe about other experiments not including those external (to the reaction) factors but then they're also generally magnitudes lower.
  2. The targets are very very hard to produce, and you only get to shoot at them once.
[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I remember hearing when it was announced last that fusion was achieved, scientists were skeptical that we had finally achieved this and we wouldn't be actually putting it to use for decades to come.

But here we are. Yes it's experimental but it's working amd producing energy. I'm just surprised we're here already, even if it's only a proof of concept at this point

[–] First 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

IAEA's estimate is that Nuclear fusion, if successfully researched and demonstrated at full capacity within 2036 at ITER (which is already lagging behind schedule) will result in commercial availability in 2050. So yes, we are still decades away from putting it to use.

Source

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the explanation

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If this how we get Godzilla?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No. When this how we get Godzilla.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But. Godzilla then how he got?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

am I having a fucking stroke

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

No we get Gozilla when we mine for underwater Tritium deposits using small nukes.

load more comments
view more: next ›