this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
521 points (98.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5467 readers
4 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Whoa, I think this meme has back pain at this point. Wasn't this an email forward in its first incarnation?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Honestly I have no idea anymore, I have seen it in a dozen forms at least.

Edit: from https://www.plainlanguage.gov/resources/humor/how-to-write-good/ :

The first set of rules (1-23) was written by Frank L. Visco and originally published in the June 1986 issue of Writers’ Digest. The second set of rules (24-53) is derived from William Safire’s Rules for Writers.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

That's remarkable. Like an archaeological dig.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BetterDev 1 points 1 year ago

It also predates the widespread colloquial use of the term "meme"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I thought I had seen it in high school, but that would have been before 86. Doesn't surprise me that it predates viral email forwards though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don't mean that as any sort of a dig. I was just wondering at...well, I guess at how old I am.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You are today's lucky 10.000

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

For every situation there is a related XKCD

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can have my parentheticals (which I quite enjoy) when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, about half of the examples are good advice and half are just grammar jokes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Unless you’re writing satire, speeches, or stories for children. (Fuck you, #1)

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Always avoid the exhausting, tedious habit of creating the longest, most boring run-on sentences that could ruin the attention span of the reader, therefore failing to get your well-encapsulated point across through layers of unnecessary text filler.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

12: avoid colons and remember to capitalise the first word of every sentence.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

13 ) consistent formatting is important

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

15: Attention to detail is key

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  1. Remember back ticks are not apostrophes. Don`t you forget it.
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never use a big word when a diminutive one will do.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Never use a sesquipedalian utterance when a diminutive one suffices.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

This is the type of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put.

I think of this every time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i mean really all of these "rules" are guidelines for formal writing at best, in daily speech it doesn't matter one iota how you type as long as people understand you.

language prescriptivism is wack

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I absolutely agree! I’m a descriptivist and not a prescriptivist when it comes to linguistics and I’m much more interested in semantics and semiotics than syntax.

I just love pointing out when even the nominally prescriptivists get it wrong. I treat it like a Los Angeles smug alert.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"How to write WELL" *Ignores rest of post.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

(i think you've missed the point; deliberately?)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Literally unreadable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love how these rules basically parodies themselves, like how exaggerations are a "billion" times worse then understatements lol.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure that's the entire joke, my guy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think “Dgar” is meant to be an acronym for “dad-joke aggregator”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Dad Geoke AggregatoR?