this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
479 points (98.2% liked)

Not The Onion

16330 readers
1856 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 minutes ago

Well that would weed all the diabetics out of the American gene pool in just a few days. I'm not sure diabetics are the real problem though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 minutes ago

Fascist could also try a bullet salad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 27 minutes ago

Cute, little Trump

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago

Considering that the GOP wants to kill SNAP, it is pretty clear that RFK wants his hands bloodied.

This guy, like the rest of that lot, are butchers of the innocent and trusting.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't that not how diabetes works?

I'm an idiot about biology anything, let alone food and drugs, but I know that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Basically now as a type 2 diabetic I cannot eat anything and I'm still at elevated sugars....

Weight loss and a super low carb diet would work.... Maybe.... But if I even fuck it up for a week my sugars will be sky high again

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

Type 1 diabetics dont make any insulin at all. So as soon as you cut off their supply they start dying. 4 days should see them all gone. (I am type 1 myself)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Certain types and situations of diabetes can be effectively controlled with a low (usually very low; ketogenic) carb diet and careful weight management. It doesn't apply to all or even most situations, which is why we use insulin.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago

Hey Marty! Every legal resident in the USA should have the same health insurance as you, dumbfuck. That would solve a lot of problems in 3rd World USA.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 hours ago

So many factors involved in controlling A1C. Not just your diet but lifestyle, exercise, access to health care and healthy inexpensive food.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

To be fair, our western diet of mainly cheap non-nutritive carbs suck. America needs desperately to change their diet but when Michelle Obama tried to encourage better eating habits the Republicans attacked her. JFK jr, on the other hand is totally nuts.
It must have been quit a challenge to find the most incompetent losers to fill the failed, fucked-up, fat, fascist, felon's cabinet.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There's no need to be fair here. Insulin is absolutely essential for diabetics, and the head of the FDA trying to proclaim that cooking classes are a viable alternative is nonsense. For type 1 diabetics, no amount of healthy eating is going to get their body to produce insulin. For type 2 diabetics, it is possible to eventually get to a point where you can be stable without insulin, but not for everybody and not right away. Insulin treatment is the only way to survive with diabetes for an extended period of time, and the focus needs to be on ensuring that insulin is both affordable and accessible.

Yes, there are things to improve in our food supply, but don't let that distract from how egregiously insane his comments are about diabetes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

This is the truth, right here.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

You do know there are different types of diabetes, right? And a lot of different things that can lead to diabetes?

Some people do get there, in part, due to poor diet, but not everyone.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago

To be fair

Well there's your problem. Never hand it to fascists (or grifters, or cult leaders, etc. — basically any kind of bad faith actors).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Michelle Obama tried to encourage better eating habits the Republicans attacked her.

Part of her plan would have banned Cheerios in schools because of added salt. That was one of the things getting pushback.

Her initiative to get added sugars listed on nutrition labels had very broad support.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

You guys have chips in schools? Bruh...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I know someone said cheerios are cereal, which they are. But we do indeed have chips, or crisps, in our schools.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

Cheerios are a breakfast cereal. Generally considered a relatively healthy one due to their lack of added sugars.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

It must have been quit a challenge to find the most incompetent losers to fill the failed, fucked-up, fat, fascist, felon’s cabinet.

Not really. Anyone who actually wants to support Trump automatically falls into that group.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 13 hours ago

You know, during ww2 when Britain enact very harsh rationing the rate of diabetes and heart disease did drop greatly. Because many fatty staples and meat were hard to come by and sugar was nearly nonexistent.

But you know what was instrumental in increasing life expectancy by almost 10 years almost overnight? The NHS after the war. Even when rationing fully ended in the late 50s life expectancy continued to be much higher despite all the previously hard to get stuff becoming readily available again.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

People will die because of these fuck holes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

Killing people is a core tenet of the Republican party.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Try not being so fat, you fucking fatties" is a reaction I have heard from people who are themselves overweight. It's genuinely maddening to see how many Americans are sold on the most superficial understanding of "healthy" as "fuckable" rather than "capable and resilient".

So much of the Trump attitude towards health seems to be geared towards eugenics against old ugly poors.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

That’s what’s stupid too is most of the eugenics are directed at things eugenics don’t even “fix” - it doesn’t matter how well bred you are you will get old and we already have plenty of hot and smart poor people, lots of them even have college educations beyond that, beauty is in the eye of the beholder

[–] [email protected] 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Challenge Accepted.

Simpsons TV show still where Lisa is holding a book seemingly titled “How to cook humans”

We’ll get insurers and Medicaid to fully cover diabetes supplies in no time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How many cooked billionaires does it take to satisfy the proletariat?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

As many as it takes.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 15 hours ago

Syringes for me, but not for thee.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

He should take a look at reality maybe?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Is a total ban on diabetes medicine on the way? This is an effort to kill anyone who isn't young and fit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

This is an effort to kill anyone who isn't young and fit.

Or also chronically ill. I'm (relatively) young and very fit, but I'm also type 1 and require insulin to live. It's eugenics, plain and simple.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (6 children)

Yeah, I’d say yes. It's a primer and warning shot. They’ll roll it out in phases.

It gets a reaction out of us. And not always a logical one. A lot of people’s gut instinct is just to deny whatever “they” say. That does two things:

First, it gets their base thinking and talking about how many T2 diabetics are supposedly just consequences of lifestyle.

Second, it pushes the left into reflexively denying that even though it’s partly true. So now, when any real conversation comes up, there’s already a schism. And they can use that to sneak more garbage through, stuff that benefits them and their friends.

Can we head them off at the pass?

No. Never.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago

Is a total ban on diabetes medicine on the way?

Insulin, anyways. I'm sure semaglutide will still be available, since it's such a weight-loss wonder-drug

[–] [email protected] 20 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (6 children)

Is he suggesting that the US is going to fund free cooking classes that are low in fat and sugar? Because that's a great idea.

And they should also provide free insulin.

Maybe we can compromise and say that you have to attend 4 hours of free cooking classes every month to receive your free insulin for the month?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 15 hours ago

They're not going to fund anything. Nothing is free.

It's a great idea, and they'll just talk about it while killing the presently funded programs, then do nothing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 day ago (9 children)

A good rule of thumb whenever I hear anything about what this administration does in regards to health I try to look at it through the lens of eugenics. They want to get rid of the people they consider "weak" and think that using money to help those that need it to be a waste of money. People with autism, weak immune systems, chronic illnesses, poor people, drug addicts, and pretty much anyone else they consider undesirable and less than human. Also, they consider our tax money as their personal bank account as if the country was a company and our taxes are their profits. Pretty fucked up, but it makes more sense than trying to rationalize clearly irrational behavior.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›