Melvin_Ferd

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Here is the summary by AI

The article suggests AI is worse than humans at summarizing documents, based on one outdated trial. But really, Crikey is just feeling threatened. AI is evolving fast, and its ability to handle vast amounts of data without the human biases Crikey often exhibits is undeniable. While they nitpick AI’s limitations, they ignore how much better it will get—probably even better than their reporters. Maybe they’re just jealous that AI could do in seconds what takes humans hours!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Mr. Vatican VII

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Would you lick it off or let the sun bake it until it's a hard crust and crumbles off

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Yea but is anything making this stuff fun

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't find it weird that CNN frames it in an argument about greenhouse gas?

To me it's such an obvious appeal to certain groups. We're way past caring about wasting resources. We get rid of AI right now where are we left with? Nothing, nothing changes as far as wasting resources go. We don't fix anything removing it.

AI is practical and probably one of the most interesting developments with the potential to be a pretty big leveler if developed correctly.

But I think the problem is that because it can level playing field it's harmful to people who want to horde their power. So they have to use media to generate a lot of hate and angry towards it so we all reject it. Look at every AI headlines and replace AI with "immigrants" or "LGQTB" it's practically cut and paste. It's harassing women and children. It's taking our jobs. They're a waste of resources. They threaten your way of life.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I'm not saying that you're not. I am saying collectively these points about wasting resources is a bit much considering all the other wastes in relation to the anger those other things generate. It's not proportional. That isn't me saying people love it. But I am saying they do use a lot of other things that generate tremendous wastes in similar ways without care.

Im pretty confident it is manufactured. Manufactured in the same way the right despise LGQTB and immigrants. If you were too ask them if their hate was driven by other sources they say the same thing. Nobody is immune to it especially if we agree with thing. We all just go with it.

Doesn't change that we know fox news plays a big part of some people's opinions and views. Doesn't mean those people are not racist or bigots to begin with. But there's a stoking of the flames. Same here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

What crypto wall? Isn't it back up?

I'd rather have all the AI and crypto than any streaming service or social media that everyone who complains about resources seems to use freely.

To me the crypto and AI is innovation which is where I want resources to go. The other crap is recreating things we already have just with extra waste and that goes ignored and makes me feel the outrage is fake or manufactured if the logic steps over a bunch of other things to focus on the new kid on the block.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Here is how I see Piracy ending. We're offered Netflix and forgot about streamers so the government went heavy handed and forced other governments to change all their laws and give up these pirates while seizing sites.

Even though there are smaller pirates, the leaders of it so are mortality wounded killing any progress. We eventually end up with cable television 3.0 and try to go back to piracy. However while we weren't looking there's a ton of new laws and tools and ability to stop it that was created while we were watching umbrella academy.

Now the final nail is using media to create a foot-in-the-door technique where media convince the public to hate a new thing. Once that zeitgeist is established laws will then slowly be created by as suggested by lobbyists which are really just a facade that would give more power to take out pirates.

Anyone know the names of the pirate Bay owners? a/Anyone hear any news on those guys. Podcasts? Articles? Viral Reddit posts? In my mind it's probably one of the top ten craziest political strong arming and over reaches in the past decade. Here is the story that I can't find for some reason. Pirate Bay placed a server inside a bank in Switzerland. The Swedish laws prevent the government from touching anything inside the bank. Freedom type thing that the USA love. This means the Swedish government couldn't be forced to shut down the server. Until Mike Pompeo on behalf of Hollywood flies to Switzerland and says you're going in or America is going to make you pay. So they change the law for America and seize the servers. My point is this is pretty fun incredibly interesting story. But we don't get these stories we get another season of making handsome real life serial killer show on Netflix. Pirating dies by suppressing it slowly over time until there's no more pirates and the ability to regain the knowledge lost its gone and trying to look up how to crack anything results in the FBI at your door and you on a no fly list. Just like other pirates and creators of technology (look up how tor creators get harassed) and these stories all get suppressed.

https://darknetdiaries.com/transcript/92/

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago

I support them adding ads and commercials into their products like pop ups and stuff or they can sell my information

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Are you saying it didn't happen? Didn't billions of people upload all their details on their own to Facebook?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We all willfully gave them our info.

 

view more: next ›