this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
553 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

16337 readers
1486 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yeah, I’d say yes. It's a primer and warning shot. They’ll roll it out in phases.

It gets a reaction out of us. And not always a logical one. A lot of people’s gut instinct is just to deny whatever “they” say. That does two things:

First, it gets their base thinking and talking about how many T2 diabetics are supposedly just consequences of lifestyle.

Second, it pushes the left into reflexively denying that even though it’s partly true. So now, when any real conversation comes up, there’s already a schism. And they can use that to sneak more garbage through, stuff that benefits them and their friends.

Can we head them off at the pass?

No. Never.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can we head them off at the pass?

No. Never.

Can it come to pass that their heads come off?

“All of this has happened before, and it will all happen again.”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. R3v0luti0n is impossible in a postindustrial society.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So was a housing price crash, until 2008.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

The crash was always a built-in undocumented feature of the bubble.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Splendid turn of phrase.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A ton of T2 diabetes is about lifestyle and not much else that’s still absolutely not a reason to deny a person medical care! What’s next? Denying cancer care if they say it happened because of your lifestyle? It’s amoral

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well think about why they're arguing this point. Break it down logically. What are you actually saying. Like when your wife gets mad you didn't take out the garbage. Is it really about the garbage or is she mad you banged her sister. There's usually a deeper issue at the root and you need to find that core belief. This is about the appearance of health and virirlity. They feel victimhood always and so they project strength. T2 Diabetes is a target because of the implication. My wife is mad because her sister is hotter. It's all about the root.

Once you know the root, you can target their insecurity.