this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
266 points (92.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27728 readers
2458 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

EU absolutely is a country.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

UK. yes. as well as US news, import export.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Twitter is not a social media anymore, it is a propaganda platform. There are regulations for media in civilized places. Twitter does not respect the law, thus it shall be banned.

If it were up to me it would be seized, because there is a public interest to this platform. Seizing it to make the algorithm transparent, fair and legal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. But a ban on algorithms would be nice.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh yes! Build Lemmy entirely from one line of lambda calculus.

While we're at it, the vegans can stop consuming inorganic chemicals.

;-)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I hate how in common parlance "algorithm" has become synonymous with "recommender system", when it's so much more basic of a concept. But whenever I used to gripe about it, or inform people of the more specific terminology back on reddit I was downvoted. So thanks to you for bringing it up first.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Well, EU is not a country, but yeah, they should either comply with our rules (which currently neither one of them does), or get fucked out of here.

I hope some local, ActivityPub based service would appear in the vacuum.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Yeah. It would help usher in a new era of social media and communities. Fb, insta, tiktok, reddit have killed smaller communities and websites. And I miss them. Internet needs to die to be born again.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I believe censorship is harmful to civilization.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think regulation would be the proper course of action, here. I mean neither do we ban American cars in Europe. We just say they have to play by our rules or they can't do business here. So I wouldn't support a ban based on country of origin. But regulation what they can and can not do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How do you regulate closed-source code to be free from back doors for spying and sabotage, and black-box feed shaping algorithms to not have bias and censorship for mass manipulation?

Don't rely on enemy services in a cold war, no matter how much they seem to follow your regulations.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think that works like all other regulations. Like for example food, chicken, cars and machinery. You take samples and check them. Or have a court decide to have a look at the paperwork... If anything looks fishy or people get harmed... Investigate. And we have investigators and experts in domains available. It's fairly easy to do. And decisions regularly rely on expert opinion...

And I don't view myself as the enemy in a cold war. I'm opposed to the current administration of the USA. But that's pretty much it. I'm not necessarily in active combat against the economy... Well... I am against privacy invading platforms. But because they invade privacy, and not because they are from a certain country.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

Yes, absolutely.

It isn't even for social media's general toxicity. It is because these Us companies are behaving so badly. Illegally. They are now openly provoking their own ban, but they think the EU is so toothless that they can get away with anything.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 day ago (2 children)

For-profit social media, certainly. I don't trust it anymore. Astroturfing, data-harvesting, I feel like they're all made to fuck us over in some way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No, because regulation works; or can work. We can require them to follow our laws because they're invested in our market too.

There are regular fines for GDPR violations for example; it just feels like our checks and fines need to happen faster and harder.

China regulates their platforms like TikTok differently in their own country than outside. We can require the same.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

How do you regulate closed-source code to be free from back doors for spying and sabotage, and black-box feed shaping algorithms to not have bias and shadow-censorship for mass manipulation?

Don't rely on enemy services in a cold war, no matter how much they seem to follow your regulations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

For one, you can make it illegal for them to be a "black-box" in the first place

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

black-box feed shaping algorithms

Recent EU legislation already requires insight into feed algorithms. They're not allowed to be black-box on huge platforms.

Back-doors is another issue, but depending on the kind of personal data, EU legislation already requires separation and different levels of protection.

If data being sent to the US can not be considered safe, it can not be transferred without explicit and informed consent. US firms create EU firms to have regional legal entities. They can store private data locally, within the EU.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am American and I would support a ban on American social media in my country.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube have fucked up public discourse. They reward rage-bait content, they're addictive by design, encourage tribalism, and they use an opaque algorithm to promote/demote posts. They silently censor ideas and content. Meta censors news in Canada.

Zuckerberg and Musk appear to have political aims they are using their platforms to promote.

Why would I want that? I get the slippery slope argument, but they are a slippery slope already.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't lump in YT with those other two. YT definitely had problems but it has a lot of great content found no-where else

[–] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You could have said the exact same thing about any of the other socmed platforms before they enshittified.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yes. Current oligarch-owned USA considers Europe an enemy because of its liberal and leftist values. Look how they've already turned us, famously allergic to fascism, towards fascism once again.

We can't rely on enemy services in a cold war. We can't review closed-source code to be free from back doors for spying and sabotage, or black-box feed shaping algorithms to not have bias and shadow-censorship for mass manipulation.

EU must ban all US-made smart products for its own safety. All closed-source software and electronics that can be used for strategic manipulation and sabotage – Google, Apple, Amazon, all of it.

They are in every European citizen's pockets, desktops, and server rooms. They know way too much about us, and have every opportunity to manipulate us:

  • Make the most intelligent people never stumble upon important information on social media.
  • Make the most compatible people never meet each other on dating sites.
  • Make the most valuable people never find career-making jobs on work-centered social media.
    '

Black box recommendation algorithms in the control of one country enables the slow, strategic destruction of Europe by billions of unnoticeable manipulations. CIA has done this shit before, and now it's being given more power than ever to do so.

China banned that shit, and China has been successful partly for its detachment from US far-right propaganda. They have also made subtle mass-manipulation difficult by making their own services.

We have functional, clunky open-source software that could easily be fitted for any purpose with the money we waste propping up foreign monopolies sabotaging us. Europe has taken a huge risk. I suspect bribery.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

I agree with everything you said except this bit:

China banned that shit, and China has been successful partly for its detachment from US far-right propaganda.

China loves US far right propaganda, the amount of Chinese people reeeeing about DEI or wokeism or the LGBTs, and fellating the South African Nazi who inherited wealth from an apartheid labour emerald mine and (for some reason, still) J. Lopsterson is kind boggling.

The common view in China is that the US is too progressive and needs to clamp down on minority rights and immigration... The mind boggles.

But yes, also fully fuck US social media and tech monopolies.

But the EU had taken risks so far as we think when push comes to shove we'll be on the same side as the US, ignoring that the US still seems to think realpolitik is an appropriate course of action. Never trust a realpoliker to have your back.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes. I've already started replacing everything I can with Europe- or Japan- or Korea-made stuff. We have to learn to be self-sufficient and vigilant. Latest was my decision to ditch stability.ai, which is anyway the most horrendous collection of dark patterns I've ever seen, with dezgo.com , which is French and as transparent as can be.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

No, but that's not to say I wouldn't be delighted to see Xitter and Meta burn. Ultimately, though, we need laws that require transparency and impartiality on the part of the owners, similar to the rules we have for television news outlets, and those rules need enforcing in no uncertain terms. It doesn't matter, then, if the service is native or foreign.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No. That wouldn't solve anything. What is needed are very harsh punishments for companies abusing their power / position, instead of the slap on the wrist they currently are.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Absolutely not. I'll rather choose for myself which content I consume than have the government choose it for me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I am actively avoiding US social media accounts, blocking US politics channels and stepping away from a number of US-based services altogether.

If the government doesn't do it, I'll do as much of it as I can. Voting with your wallet is some US anarchocapitalist nonsense, but if my disgust removes incentives I'll take it as a side benefit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

i live in Brazil, and would be 100% down with X being banned, even Instagram or Facebook if necessary.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck no. The Americans provide 90% of our entertainment and they're actually fun people to interact with and chat with (the ones that aren't wearing MAGA hats that is). What am I gonna go without Americans on social media? Talk about fucking Table Mountain? Join the Europeans in looking down on the USA for everything and always acting like their own shit doesn't stink?

Fuck that, I'd start using VPNs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They can join us on non-American social media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not a blanket ban no, but if they constantly break our laws then yes. And I'm perfectly ok with laws that some would decry as censorship (anti-hate-speech, fact-checking) or claim makes business impossible (strict interpretations of GDPR).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›