this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5345 readers
224 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

3 assassination attempts. In what 3 months? And they're all from Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (9 children)

The most recent "assassination attempt" was just drummed up by the media. I haven't seen any evidence it was anything other than a man with some guns in his car who happened to be near the rally.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

3? What others than the one in Butler?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The other 2 were prevented

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Yeah but he's "important" fuck your kids though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

yeah it is crazy fact of life that schools get shot up so much more frequently than police stations and federal buildings.

almost like politicians and police are safer than school children in the system run by police and politicians.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Also that this "fact of life" almost entirely applies only to schools in the US. The world works in mysterious ways indeed. ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what’s so frustrating is that this “they’re a fact of life” mentality is a self-fulfilling prophecy. and the longer it continues to used as a justification for inaction, the harder it becomes to convince people that gun violence is a solvable problem.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (5 children)

yeah, but the solution is taking peoples guns away and many people (as do I) belive that the right to bear arms is an important human right

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i mean this as a genuine question: why do you think it’s important that people have access to guns? i never really got the appeal, but also haven’t talked to many people who do think guns are important, so it would be nice to hear a different perspective on this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (10 children)

for one I just belive that every human should be able to defend themselfs with weapons, if we didn't have guns I'd belive in the right to bear swoards or a bow

but now to why I belive this:

so you should know I'm an anarchist, so I reject every authority, that's why I think we should have guns, so we can stand up against authority if we need to or even if we lived in an anarchist utopia, we should have them in case a forgein nation would attack

then you also have to realize, that you can kill someone without a gun, but only if you're the stronger one. now who is stronger than the avarege woman? the avarege man! so the avarege man could rape and traumatize the avarege woman with no instant consequences so how can the avarege woman defend themself? with a gun

now I am a transgender individual in a country growing more fascist by the day, should I have to fear assault, rape and murder only because I'm different? no, I should have to be able to defend myself

I accept that your opinion may be different, and that's ok, there are good reasons to ban guns, this is just my stance on it

also, it basically boiles down to one thing: do you preffer freedom or safety? because freedom isn't safe and safety isn't free, I personally like freedom more, that's why I like my guns (and the fact, that gunsmithing is my favourite hobby)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know, if nobody had weapons then you wouldn’t need a weapon to defend yourself with

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yes, I would, as I statet, physically stronger people could easily beat or strangle me to death

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just like someone with a bigger/better gun could.

It's a slippery slope.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For real. Any gun I could obtain as a private citizen is not going to stand up to the weight of the police, let alone the US military if a true authoritarian regime took over. My right to a hunting rifle doesn't matter when they have tanks and drones.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that's not rly how guns work, if I was rly good with guns I could kill someone with a .22lr if they had a 9mm and were bad with guns, the thing is different guns are good for different things, you won't be able to use a shotgun effectively at 50m++ for example or a sniper rifle at 7m--

also how good you are with guns isn't a genetics thing like physical strength

of course I'd rather live in a world without guns, but the moment one person has a gun everyone should have one

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I always wonder why the usa is so against iran or north koera getring nukes... if some countrys have nukes, everyone shiuld have them...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

yeah, I do belive that if any all countries should have nukes

> I always wonder why the usa is so against iran or north koera getring nukes

this is because their intention isn't for countries to defend themselfs, but to be the world power and have a monopoly on violence (as every state does), that's also the reason I don't like the state.

now, why do you think most states don't want you to get guns?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Only important in the US, though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

no, there are many countries with some gun rights actually (though they don't really have school shootings), like austria for example (you don't need a license for a lot of guns here and those you need the license for it's easy to get)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"That's why your parents' tax dollars should be paying for nice, safe, private religious schools!" /s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

No, for tanks. School children need little tanks, like those Barbie thingies but bullet proof and closed. Make schools drive in.

Or give each child it's own protective glass shield. Maybe some sort of cubicle.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Seeing the top and back completely open, I see it as just for show/security theater.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's time to deploy the-glass-is-necessary-because-its-really-a-hologram conspiracy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I read that JD Vance is an AI holopresence

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Or a "hole"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

JD Vance is just ChatGPT in a robot in a skin suit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wasn't the guy who shot at trump staged behind him?

All that glass is doing is paying the audio engineers for extra work to get the front rows speakered too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One who hit him was to the front right of him.

But was thinking why you don't just pick a spot behind him.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, they should just put a box or dome over him as it would just need someone crazy enough but smart enough to calculate an arc.

Better yet, just hold the rallies in a properly inspected building. (Not sure if any property owners will let them rent anymore though.)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Airtight and soundtight would be funny

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder how they deal with drones.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There’s only one way to find out!

Hypothetically.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Can't wait until we use a predator drone to dome a predator.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Apparently they are gaining ground in the polls.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I fucking hate this. Are people really that oblivious regarding who these people have shown themselves to be?

On one side, the top of the ticket is somebody who has lied and cheated their whole life, even to a criminal extent, and has never shown any capacity to learn or grow in any meaningful way. They have shown nothing but contempt for anything related to justice or democracy or social progress. The VP pick for this candidate is funded by tech bro billionaires whose entire philosophy is predicated on the notion that a few wealthy and powerful oligarchs should dominate a rule over their lesser peasant-like laborers.

On the other side, the top of the ticket is a career civil servant who has been elected to all three branches of government and holds a juris doctore that proves their competency in law and the processes therein. They have flaws, but appear to be open to learning and growing, changing stances on policies as the times change and more information comes out. The VP pick for this candidate is perhaps best known for expanding liberties and ensuring that all schoolchildren were properly fed in the state that they were elected Governor of.

This election should be a fucking blowout victory for the latter candidate. It's absolutely absurd that it could be even remotely close. There is, and I'm not exaggerating when I say this, nothing redeeming about the other ticket. Nothing. They will not help you in any way. They will consolidate wealth and power for themselves and their inner circle, and you ain't in it. They are not only unwilling, but unable to show any sincere compassion for you. The best they can offer is sociopathic performance of compassion to manipulate you into giving them your vote. Do not fall for these proven charlatans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

You may reliably expect it to be reported as such, whatever the facts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Fake polls paid by GOP would explain that if I read correctly that big post with lots of comments here (on lemmy) 1 or 2 days ago.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

This is an opinion only. I wanted to preface it that way because I realized how much it sounded like I had inside knowledge. I do not. I'm a drunk, ignorant redneck.

I wouldn't put it past them, but those polls shouldn't move the needle very far at places like the silver bulletin or 538 because they weigh based on how trustworthy the polls are. Reputable polls aren't getting bought and fake polls may hit news articles but don't really hit forecasts very hard.

I've watched 538 since they came back online. There was a point where Kamala had greater than a 60 in 100 chance to win. Right now it's about as low as it has been with her up 53 to 46.

We're halfway through October so I have no idea if we're getting a surprise. I'd like to see something that tilts things blue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Who are? The Kids Getting Shot Party?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I hate living in this time that makes satire obsolete.

Can anyone please think of the makers of south park and how they are supposed to make fun of self owning clowns like this?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Satire is dead so they had to get into the restaurant business

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

No worries, they'll find a way to both sides this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

“Thoughts and prayers.”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This actually makes all the sense. If he truly believes it then he’s rightly afraid. If he doesn’t believe then this sends the message to his supporters that they are right to be afraid. Either way it also tries to give him a “martyr in life” kinda vibe by trying to paint him as someone so dangerous to their little deep-state(that totally isn’t 100% conservatives if it’s anything at all) would want to get rid of.

He also has a very shootable personality and platform, and Trumping have been shot at definitely gives some reason why he’d be behind glass himself.

Benefit of the doubt interpretation though is a guy who can afford to have security and bullet-proof glass telling little children to “deal with it” is a fucking scumbag-extraordinaire.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well yeah, duh, that's why he has the glass. /S

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

This, but without the /s. Completely non-sarcastic.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›