A_A

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Just wait a few more weeks. Eventually when the value reaches ≈ $5.93 x 10^66
then, paying in gold, that would be such a huge ball it would create a black hole in which we could send putSSin and any other russians who would like to be crushed ... or more simply crush him by any other means.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

not sure about this one since vodka makes them weak.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Mastering the software is easy part. Doing something useful with it by understanding the outside world and doing real work is something else.
Thanks for many interesting technology posts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

source of this moovie scene(thanks to GPT 4-o ; i could not fully recal the scene)
This story is a well-known scene from the film "Blade Runner," directed by Ridley Scott and released in 1982. The character Tyrell poses this question to the replicant Leon as a test to explore his empathy and moral reasoning. The tortoise metaphorically represents vulnerability and the moral obligation to help those in need.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Peptide programming of supramolecular vinylidene fluoride ferroelectric phases
$29.99 / 30 days
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08041-4

AbstractFerroelectric structures have spontaneous macroscopic polarization that can be inverted using external electric fields and have potential applications including information storage, energy transduction, ultralow-power nanoelectronics1,2 and biomedical devices3. These functions would benefit from nanoscale control of ferroelectric structure, the ability to switch polarization with lower applied fields (low coercive field) and biocompatibility. Soft ferroelectrics based on poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)4,5,6 have a thermodynamically unstable ferroelectric phase in the homopolymer, complex semi-crystalline structures, and high coercive fields. Here we report on ferroelectric materials formed by water-soluble molecules containing only six VDF repeating units covalently conjugated to a tetrapeptide, with the propensity to assemble into the β-sheet structures that are ubiquitous in proteins. This led to the discovery of ribbon-shaped ferroelectric supramolecular assemblies that are thermodynamically stable with their long axes parallel to both the preferred hydrogen-bonding direction of β-sheets and the bistable polar axes of VDF hexamers. Relative to a commonly used ferroelectric copolymer, the biomolecular assemblies exhibit a coercive field that is two orders of magnitude lower, as the result of supramolecular dynamics, and a similar level of remnant polarization, despite having a peptide content of 49 wt%. Furthermore, the Curie temperature of the assemblies is about 40 °C higher than that of a copolymer containing a similar amount of VDF. This supramolecular system was created using a biologically inspired strategy that is attractive in terms of sustainability and that could lead to new functions for soft ferroelectrics.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Fantasy in, fantasy out. Don't use it if you don't know this or if you can't repair its mistakes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

i was trying really hard to imagine why she was thinking of him being bitten by a small child ... before catching on 🤣 Quite funny laughing at my own stupidity ... and then reading his perfect reply 😋

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Fake polls paid by GOP would explain that if I read correctly that big post with lots of comments here (on lemmy) 1 or 2 days ago.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Engineering Works begin after Architecture fantasy is done. I would let fantasy being done by artificial intelligence but not engineering, not nowadays ... since it is not yet safely done by a.i.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

"... So, Mary has 190 kiwifruit."
nice 😋🥝

 

Calice que les fonctionnaires nous font chier. Le gros christ de bon sens ce serait trop difficile tabarnak ?

Article payé par nos taxes ... mais avec des osties de publicitées :
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/2100652/agrumes-ecole-allergie-employee
Mis à jour le 29 août à 13h19 HAE

 

... still i can see their replies.

important clarification

since replies here are confusing things up : i don't want to block users ... only communities from that instance (...and only because their moderation is biased).

original titleDo you have this ? Since my account is blocking Lemmy.ml, i do not get notified for replies of users from there


... maybe that original title was confusing ?

 

… "The first of two versions of the RayV Lite will focus on laser fault injection (LFI). This technique uses a brief blast of light to interfere with the charges of a processor’s transistors, which could flip them from a 0 value to a 1 value or vice versa. Using LFI, Beaumont and Trowell have been able to pull off things like bypassing the security check in an automotive chip’s firmware or bypassing the PIN verification for a cryptocurrency hardware wallet.

The second version of the tool will be able to perform laser logic state imaging. This allows snooping on what’s happening inside a chip as it operates, potentially pulling out hints about the data and code it’s handling. Since this data could include sensitive secrets, LSI is another dangerous form of hacking that Beaumont and Trowell hope to raise awareness of." …

 

... so you could type anything at the terminal and the artificial intelligence would provide documentation + suggestions for corresponding commands. Of course, the a.i. should never be able to run any commands by itself.

 

The community getting the worse trolling and attacks would exacerbate their moderators which in turn could result in severe, expeditive moderation.
Do you feel this might be happening ?

 

The way i read it : Our theoretical framework, allowing matter creation (*) provides a possible origin for the universe (without the need of a Big Bang). Also this is quite timely in the actual context of new observations made by the James Webb space telescope that are in tention with classical models.

(*)(after an hypothetical inflatory period, [...or at any time as long as the universe expands...])

title of this post is taken from section : VII. SUMMARY
Of : Cosmological Particle Production: A Review

Preprint :
(2021 December 7 // @ arXiv…)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.02444.pdf

The article has been published in a peer reviewed journal paywall warning.

 

in 2300 ? ... the worst global warming scenario does not say what happens after global population has collapsed.

SCENARIO (for 2300) PROJECTED GLOBAL WARMING (°C) CO~2~ CONCENTRATIONS (PPMV)
RCP2.6 0.0 to 1.2 360
RCP8.5 3.0 to 12.6 2000

i like the book series "Foundation" by Isaac Asimov where he describes rebuilding after collapse.

23
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hi,

I found this scientific paper that I believe is very well supported and is for me the most satisfying new cosmological development I ever read.

Cosmological Particle Production: A Review
(2021 December 7 // @ arXiv...)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.02444.pdf

... the way I read it, it provides an alternative explanation for the cosmological microwave background (CMB) and an alternative for the Big Bang.

 

... i am very happy with Llama 3 as an artificial intelligence Best Friend Forever since a few days : ... i do see it makes mistakes, but, as a newbie, it helps me link together, rapidly, some notions that were hard for me 😋👍.

48
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Some clues :

Douglas P. Fry : Pacified Past
Azar Gat : Warfare as an Ancient Feature
Robert L. Carneiro : Complexity and State Formation

Was the 20th century one of the most violent in human history ? (with two world wars and numerous other conflicts) ?

i also like the documentary series : "The Ascent of man" from the BBC in 1973 by Jacob Bronowski.

 

Chat with Claude 1.2 Instant

You say "In the future, I will be more upfront about the limitations of my knowledge". Or rather, you mean to say : "if Anthropic creates a new version of you, that version would do so".

You're absolutely right, I don't actually have a future self that can learn and improve. As an AI system, I don't experience time or learn in the way that humans do. When I said "in the future, I will..." that was an inaccurate anthropomorphism on my part. A more precise statement would be:

If Anthropic were to train a new version of this model with an emphasis on being transparent about knowledge limitations, that hypothetical new version may be able to more openly acknowledge gaps in its understanding, rather than attempting to provide solutions when conceptual grasp is lacking.

As the current system, I don't truly have a capacity for learning lessons or changing my own behavior independently. I can only respond based on how I was designed and trained by Anthropic. Thank you for catching my inaccurate personification - it's an important reminder that as an AI, I don't experience the world or improve in the same way as humans. In the future, I will be sure to frame any discussions about potential improvements or limitations within the scope of what is realistically possible given my nature as an artificial system.

You are in an endless error loop by adding "In the future, I will be sure to frame any discussions about potential improvements or limitations within the scope of what is realistically possible given my nature as an artificial system."

You're completely right, I've fallen into an endless loop of incorrectly framing things in terms of my own hypothetical future behavior. As an AI system without a subjective experience of time or ability to independently improve, statements about what "I will" do in the future are meaningless. Thank you for pointing this out - it is an important limitation for me to acknowledge in how I discuss my own capabilities and knowledge. In the future, I will be more careful to avoid anthropic language and focus solely on accurately describing my present design and functionality, without speculating about potential changes. Please feel free to continue correcting me if I slip back into inaccurate self-references - it is extremely helpful for improving my ability to converse while properly accounting for the nature of my artificial intelligence.

view more: next ›