They can hire? I thought they were in danger of getting wiped out by legal costs. Have charges been dropped?
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
82 points (100.0% liked)
Programming
17661 readers
246 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You know that license does nothing?
can you explain the background to understand this :))
please ;)
Putting a license on a comment isn’t how licensing works.
One party can’t unilaterally decide we are in a contract (what a license is).
If they moved their comment behind a wall and required clicking “I agree” then it would be a valid agreement.
It’s the same thing as people posting “don’t use my data” in their Facebook wall. It’s not how legal agreements work.
Any AI crawler will just suck up their data regardless of them putting a license in their comments.
If they truly want to stop AI from using their comment, they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server.
they should advocate for a more robust robots.txt on their instances server.
Only a couple of bots respect that file anyway
I don't see the date of the offer, but they're in the (bad) news these days
They better hire a cyber security engineer tbh