this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
550 points (97.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26734 readers
1449 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
550
(sh.itjust.works)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 273 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Can't unionize if you don't have the energy to fight.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yep, you probably end up working with different groups of people too also making unionization harder.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Actually, that would make it even easier, in theory. You'd meet more of your coworkers and would be able to more easily spread the word and discuss pros/cons, etc.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 192 points 6 months ago (15 children)

This seems idiotic from the employer's perspective. You're limiting your pool of candidates a lot by requiring that their life can accomodate essentially 24 hours of possible shift time. Companies do shit like this and then complain "nobody wants to work anymore"

[–] [email protected] 175 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is a selective filter. It seeks the most desperate because they will take any and all abuse.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago (5 children)

They also leave the milisecond they can which means the company constantly has to find replacements and retrain them. Lots of resources wasted just to abuse people rather than maximize profit by treating people better.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 6 months ago

Slash education, raise cost of living, lower the minimum working age and forcing ppl to work shit jobs is actually viable.

I think there's a political party whose whole platform is based on this for this very reason

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)

As long as "temporary" foreign worker programs exist, there isn't a shortage of labour as far as the elite are concerned.

A limited pool of local applicants is a benefit to them. Then they get to bring in foreigners who don't know the value of their work in a western country and don't know the laws that protect them, both labour laws and actual criminal laws.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They can rotate my balls in and out of their mouth

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 6 months ago

Because we havent had a general strike in a while

[–] [email protected] 69 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Industrial engineer here. I have no fucking clue. It was theorized it might be better overall like 30 years ago, but by the time i graduated college it was understood that so long as you have management during changeovers so later shifts aren’t left confused or unsupervised you get all the real benefit of rotating shifts without the tremendous downside of all your workers being constantly off and pissed.

Also they should be providing later shifts with free healthy lunches and other incentives to keep them in good health to reduce the costs to their bodies of later shifts. Late shift operators need extra assistance because they’re living against society and circadian rhythms. Poor health also reduces performance so this isn’t what they should do because it’s right, it’s what they should do because if they don’t they’re always going to be frustrated at late shift performances

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'd hazard a guess that financial impacts of reduced performance as a result of this torturous schedule pale in comparison to the cost due to injuries.

I've recently had to work a couple of overnight shifts when I was overwise working basically dawn to dusk. Staying awake isn't that hard. Getting real sleep becomes the struggle. What surprised me though was the vertigo, constant low grade nausea, and dizziness that disappeared after a normal full NIGHT's rest. I may feel like a night owl sometimes, but my body does not agree.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 6 months ago (8 children)

I don't think this is intentionally evil, it's simply most people don't want to work the night shift, and they don't want to pay extra for people to want to work the night shift, so they distribute the night shift load on a schedule. So everyone has a crappy night shift every couple weeks but no one person constantly has the night shift.

I'm sure if you volunteered, they give you the night shift every day if you want

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago (16 children)

I think a lot of places in the world would call this intentionally evil. Literally forcing everyone to take part of the night shift or starve. That likely only works because people in that area have no choice. It's intentionally evil.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago (5 children)

What I have gathered after seeing threads like this pop up on Reddit periodically over about 11 years, and most of the responses here, is...

Fuck if there's a reason.

No, seriously. Pretty sure it's become standard and as Capitalism and Management do, they follow whatever bullshit tradition exists.

That said, I personally have always felt factory and retail work fuck with schedules so much because it maintains control and limits sociability outside of work and work groups. Thus increasing retention by artificially creating social nodes we feel a part of and/or do not want to be removed from. Likely created by the same people who cut pensions and created things like Mining Towns.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago

Because you’re not expected to have a home life that takes precedence over work anymore.

Rotating shifts sacrifice the employees everything to reduce staffing and training costs.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Most people only choose swing or graveyard with a differential. Rotating allows employers to fill shifts without offering differentials.

I used to work nights and got a differential. I would have been significantly less complacent without one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago

Sounds like they had to do that to keep the night shift people from quitting. Probably not a place to go work lol.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago

Are they just trying to destroy your soul and your health?

Yes,

But likely for a very stupid reason like 50 years ago some consultant had to give a plan to increase efficiency but forgot until the night before.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I used to work at a place with 3 shifts, and they rotated them because everyone wanted 1st shift rather than 2nd and 3rd. I chose to stay on 2nd because it paid a bit more and I don't like getting up early. It would have been hell to switch every single week!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We switched every 2 weeks. Your sleep never adapted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think the big issue is that the rotation is every week. Every other week or more would be better.

In a strong union environment, this would likely get addressed with a combination of higher pay and seniority. Senior people choose their shifts and if junior members have to work night shifts, at least they get compensated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (5 children)

It's because there aren't enough unions in this godforsaken country.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

Get rotated idiot.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If Green Tractor Factory ever starts hiring again you're welcome to come here, we don't rotate shifts, we make 90k a year, we get free health insurance. Because we're UAW. But we're also about to lay off so it might be a minute.

I've worked all three shifts. There's guys been stuck on 2nd for 20 years, and 2nd shift is fucking WACK. From that perspective I kind of understand rotating shifts because everyone gets fucked the same. It's more equitable. From every other perspective it's shitty as fuck.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago

Kia plant I worked at for 4 years was like this. Countless wrecks after shift change, untold divorces and ruined lives due to never being able to plan anything. Terrible

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If anyone's willing to put up with that schedule you might as well try for being an air traffic controller. Way higher salary.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've worked this shift pattern before, and found it very difficult. They call it a 'continental' shift pattern in the UK - it's not a new thing, 'cos the job I'm thinking of was 30 years ago. Switching from sleeping during the night to sleeping during the day is okay if you're on permanent nights, but trying to change every couple of weeks can be impossible (I remember once failing to get any real sleep during the day, having to spend the next 12 hours at work, and then collapsing on my way home the next day.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Fuck if I know the answer to this, but someone I know well and respect works one of these shifts, and I don’t get it.

4 on 3 off and swap the next week, I get.

But it’s like these were designed to fuck up the workers’ health and lives. Oh, wait, they probably were.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

I was a manager of a team with rotating 12 hour 6 to 6 shifts.

It was a datacenter. We had to staff the building 24x7x365. Billions of dollars of equipment, not to mention the transactions flowing through. No mistakes allowed here.

We paid $15/hour in 2010. Entry level. But it was a foot into the industry for someone without experience. Tasks were light security, walk the floor, swap drives, be on hand for server emergencies.

We used the rotation to onboard. No one did nights solo (no one else in the building) until they knew the job. Two weeks days, two weeks nights, back and forth. Two days on, one day off. 6-day rotation meant no one person was always stuck with weekends. And overtime pay every week.

We managed the schedule with a staff of 4.

Prior, the night shifts were handled by sysadmins who would work a day shift, go to the break room and get a few hours of sleep between tasks, then shower and go back on day shift. That really sucked. I did it for more than a year.

We had plenty of applicants every time a position opened. Folks tended to like the rotation as no one would get stuck with repeat holidays or all overnight. It sucked in a fair way to everyone. And if someone missed a shift (sick, emergency, etc.) I would have to fill the shift. It happened at least once a month. It was a good team. I liked all of my people, and after I got canned, they all wrote recommendations for me on LinkedIn.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

I work a job where I'm covering other shifts a fair amount as well as working doubles. I also do not get Holidays/any extra days off. Prior to this I was in a salaried corporate middle management job, so for the past 20 years I've worked 55+ hours a week on average. I can tell you that for this particular job, yes, their goal is to destroy your health so that they get a few good years out of you and then you'll leave because it's too hard on you. That way they never have to worry about paying their workers (outside of a small percentage with high fortitude) wages that are much above baseline.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It's usually because they can't get full teams willing to work only the shitty shifts. So they rotate.

When I was in retail management we had a 3-week rotating shift as well, and it was super dumb. We'd end up over 3 weeks opening, closing, or having off each day once, except for Tuesday, which we opened twice (Tuesdays were staff meetings so all managers worked).

But the worst part was each week we'd start with 2 closing shifts and end with 2 opening shifts instead of doing all opens or closes, so each week we'd have a night we'd get out the door around midnight and have to be back to open the doors at 6am...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I work a "9-5," which is basically remote meetings or email from 7-8:30 while I try to eat something and get my kids dressed, work through lunch so I can take "lunch" at the end of the day to be able to pick my kids up in time, go home and finish emails and hope to wrap up by dinner.

How people are working schedules like this is beyond me. I'm going insane as it is, and my job is "cushy." My doctor tells me I need to work less and create less stress in my life or I'm going to start bleeding out of my ears, and he looks more tired than I do. I feel like the only hour or two I get to relax is right before bed, which makes me stay up late desperately trying to hold onto that feeling of mild relaxation because I know, at best, I won't feel that way for another 24 hours.

My doctor says I need to follow up and crap for concerns, and I keep explaining to him that I have to come during work, which means 12min out if his day, but between driving, checking in, waiting in the waiting room, finally going back to the patient room, nurse check in, waiting, talking to the doctor, checking back in at the front desk, then driving back to work DURING THE WORK DAY is like two hours, and it also means if I do the follow up, labs, follow ups, specialist, labs suggested... I'll lose my job, which provides the insurance to afford those things in the fucking first place.

Everyone where I work is scared to quit for fear of working more hours on a worse schedule for less money. Everyone at the top seems to work remote at will and forces us into meetings about how to reduce burnout like they do, which is apparently by working less, having more schedule freedom, and then bragging about it by holding meetings about how to live more like they do, which, if we did, would get all of us fired within a month.

load more comments
view more: next ›