this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
113 points (91.9% liked)

Programming

17504 readers
13 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why We Can't Have Nice Software

https://andrewkelley.me/post/why-we-cant-have-nice-software.html

From Andrew R. Kelley, he's the author of the Zig language

@programming

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 152 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Is the reason capitalism? I bet it's capitalism

Edit: it's capitalism

[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You're cheating. The answer is always capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not always! Sometimes it's eg. cognitive biases

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Now now... Oftentimes it's Ronald Reagan as well....

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Shit, you're right. Good catch.

Although, Reagan was, ultimately, a tool of Capitalism, so it still works.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The only mention of capitalism in the article is specifically venture capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Not sure it’s capitalism per se. Perhaps rampant waste. Criticism of capitalism could include monopoly formation; massive tech companies buy small ones (obtain more capital = more control over production = more profit).

There’s despair over everyone, big & small, resolving the same recreated problems. Kelley doesn’t talk about breaking Microsoft up (i.e. redistributing their capital). He implies he’d be ok for Microsoft to maintain its market position if it just fixed some damn bugs.