this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
126 points (96.3% liked)
Linux
7283 readers
238 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system
Also check out:
Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm sorry this dude has to go through this shit. If I could, I would help, but there just isn't any time. I'm fighting NixOS and just getting things to work for me. There isn't even time to get it working for non-technical folk, let alone disabled folk.
My blame goes to the gate keepers who want to keep linux an elitist space. The people that want things to be hard so that they can feel superior and laugh at others who can't do what they do. The people that unironically say RTFM.
Linux could be such a great distro for normal users but the very first step of installing it is already a hurdle for many people. And yet many linux users recommend dumb shit like Arch to beginners or tell them to buy (and support) non-Linux hardware vendors instead of funnelling money into the linux ecosystem.
If the majority of Linux users who could actually invested monetarily into opensource and the linux ecosystem, and the Linux Foundation invested more than 2% of it 200 million annually into the kernel and advocacy, maybe things would look different. But it seems like we're a long way from the linux community actually being welcoming and self-funding. We'll have to wait for corporate sponsors like Valve to actually make the OS popular and worthy of interest to app developers and accessibility advocates before the community realises that being popular does come with more benefits than negatives.
Anti Commercial-AI license
You're jumbling things together here that come separately from separate individuals and have nothing to do with one another. I will reply only to this one:
If someone literally replies "RTFM" to your request I'm on your side.
If they reply something like "what you are asking is literally the first paragraph of that utlity's man page" I find it much more reasonable. It might be nicer to then quote that paragraph, but it's not wrong to point out that often the info you're looking for is just a few keystrokes away, on your machine, even without an internet connection.
Read The Fantastic Manual
I'm not jumbling anything together. The Linux community is full of toxic, elitist edgelords that expose various behaviours which are entirely uninviting to beginners. Those behaviours are also very annoying for people like me who want stuff answered without responses that sound belittling or like a challenge of ones skills.
Of course there are users who seem incapable of reading a manual and even pointing them to the passage with "you can find more information here, it should answer your question. If that doesn't, feel free to explain further and I'll gladly help you" nets a question about exactly what's written in the passage. My way of dealing users unwilling to read is not to respond, not RTFM.
Anti Commercial-AI license
Can I hazard a guess?
Did you complain that linux needs to ditch the CLI to become more usable, to which people responded "actually I like the CLI and it's necessary to keep for these 14 reasons even if you never had to use it due to gui, and help will always be offered through the CLI commands because it's easier to offer a simple one liner that fixes the issue instead of walking you through 15 screenshots of some arcane GUI program they may never even have used?"
Gotta be honest, people can be dicks for sure, but usually when I see it, it's because instead of learning the operating system that exists they demand the entire FOSS community bend to their specific need instead of them learning anything. It's the digital version of moving to CA from Texas because of their shitty laws and then trying to make CA's laws match the ones you're used to, that you just left, because they sucked. Sometimes the answer is to learn the new thing instead of reshape it into the old, and that's ok! Frankly when I switched I saw it as an exciting learning opportunity (even if it was kinda frustrating sometimes, so was biology class and that was fun too!)
I may be wrong about it in this case, but I would def be interested in what was said preceding them being dicks to you (which I totally believe they were dicks, I'm just curious if it was completely unwarranted, or if it was in response to the usual unreasonable demand.)
Arch is not dumb shit and recommending it to beginners is fine if they are curious and want to learn about stuff.
Recommending Arch to people who just want a working machine is silly, and stuff like Gentoo is kind of dumb shit.
But if you want a simple "it just works" distro you should probably be using Mint or Pop! or similar, and avoiding trying to do anything unnecessarily advanced unless you are cool with reading manuals and so on.
I don't think I ever saw a Linux user that doesn't want it to have widespread adoption
It's the paradox of wanting Linux to be widely supported but not wanting it to become a walled garden experience. The average consumer is not keen on "different" and "complex" and designing all of Linux around the preferences of those average consumers would mean sacrificing the advanced features and customisation power users enjoy.
You've never met an eternal September Linux user?
I regularly encounter such people online and offline, as well as people who abhor GUIs or making Linux easier to use.
Anti Commercial-AI license