Fediverse

28541 readers

339 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

190

Threads deepens its ties to the open social web, aka the ‘fediverse’ | TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Meta announced that users on Threads will be able to see fediverse replies on other posts besides their own. In addition, posts that originated through the Threads API, like those created via third-party apps and scheduling services, will now be syndicated to the fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It took around a year for a solo dev (and a couple contributors) to develop a fully federated platform. Why is it taking one of the largest companies on the planet this long to make such tiny changes that are useless anyway.

And why are they releasing it like this instead of releasing everything at once?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because every step of the way, they need a flock of MBAs to figure out the answer to the question "How do we make money off of this?"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

I'm rather guessing the other way around. Because they can't directly extract money from this, they can't justify to their shareholders to sit down full-time devs. Instead, this is a project solely run by interns and student.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It is a different level of scale, mastodon has about 1 million users spread over a bunch of instances. Threads has over 200 million users on one instance. also due to the network nature of social media the amount of connections and messages sent through those connections can scale exponentially with the amount of users.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Definitely can appreciate the carefulness here. Imagine they just open the floodgates and now some random Mastodon instance on a $5 VPS is getting hammered with millions of activities because they followed an account with millions of followers on Threads, and now it's federating millions of likes and thousands of posts.

Meta is trying to be a good fediverse participant here. They could just come in and crush the entire fediverse and be like "lol should have gotten beefier servers".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'd hope it's carefulness but it doesn't seem like it. Facebook should want to destroy fediverse instances (from a business point of view), they are supposed to be a monopoly and the fediverse is their biggest competitor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Only time will tell. They've definitely done their own share of EEE like for a while you could use Facebook Messenger over XMPP then closed it down.