towerful

A reminder that Georgia (state) was a part of the whole 2020 election denial bullshit.

Georgia (country) has a seemingly left leaning president (wanting to join EU), but with a parliament seemingly working against them (eg overturning veto of the controversial Foreign Agent law).

This is a very very broad outsiders opinion. I'd love to hear from a variety of people living in Georgia, and what they reckon!

I have massively enjoyed Mulligans story telling.
I have always been in awe of Matt Mercer and his ability to story craft and world build.
I have been blown away with both Brennan's voice acting and story telling.
Brennan seems to fully enhabit NPC characters. Hugely engrossing/enchanting in the world he builds!
The way Brennan folds PC actions into the story is phenomenal. How CR Downfall progressed through the episodes, thanks to Brennan's off the cuff reactions and NPC attitude, was amazing - and got me addicted to more Brennan.
The abstract journeys, the emotional investment that I felt (and I saw the cast had) was delightful.
Like, I could see the possible threads he was kinda weaving but absolutely enjoyed wherever the PCs took it. I know it kinda scripted, in that the calamity has been a part of history for 2.5 campaigns now. But the way he made the party literally seem like the Gods were carving out this actual piece of history was breathtaking. God's having extra "GM rules power" within their "field of influence" is such a great rule.

The collapse of Aeor, Gods Vs those that consider themselves gods, the backstory of previous campaigns... Such a huge task, and executed so well by Brennan.
Absolutely phenomenal 3 episodes of CR!

Follow sensible H&S rules.
Split the responsibility between the person that decided AI is able to do this task and the company that sold the AI saying it's capable of this.

For the case of the purchasing company, obviously start with the person that chose that AI, then spread that responsibility up the employment chain. So the manager that approved it, the managers manager, all the way to the executive office & company as a whole.
If investigation shows that the purchasing company ignored sales advice, then it's all on the purchasing company.

If the investigation shows that the purchasing company followed the sales advice, then the responsibility is split, unless the purchasing company can show that they did due diligence in the purchase.
For the supplier, the person that sold that tech. If the investigation shows that the engineers approved that sales pitch, then that engineers employment chain. If the sales person ignored the devs, then the sales employment chain. Up to the executive level.

No scape goats.
Whatever happens, C office, companies, and probably a lot of managers get hauled into court.
Make it rough for everyone in the chain of purchase and supply.
If the issue is a genuine mistake, then appropriate insurance will cover any damages. If the issue is actually fraud, then EVERYONE (and the company) from the level of handover upwards should be punished

Thank you

Prosecuting treasonous rapists?

I take it step 3 is ??

I'm not defending anyone.

This strikes me as manufactured violence triggered in a section of society that has been manipulated to an extreme.

I believe hotel rooms & their contents are specifically designed around this

The pope is jealous

Spacex uses methane

Ah, sorry. I didn't realise this was an excel (help) community.
I was just about to ask about the proportion...
Also, I'm not an excel person, but feel I have to help!

Based on your research, there will be a total number of blocks mined which you need to account for.
So, total up the number of blocks mined (*) and divide that by the number of blocks found.
This will give you the ratio of diamond ore blocks to total blocks.

I feel like you must be doing something similar for the value?

*: worth having this total near the top in static rows, so you don't have to do strange cell references.
This also allows you to expand your sheets to have further seeds/research-projects which can give a summary view of the average (maybe multiple summaries for different depths)