this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
264 points (98.9% liked)

News

23014 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Missouri state lawsuit claimed that case against Republican nominee infringes on voters’ constitutional rights

The US supreme court on Monday rejected a bid by the state of Missouri to halt Donald Trump’s upcoming sentencing for his conviction in New York on felony charges involving hush money paid to a porn star and left a related gag order until after the 5 November presidential election.

The decision by the justices came in response to a lawsuit by the state of Missouri claiming that the case against Trump infringed on the right of voters under the constitution to hear from the Republican presidential nominee as he seeks to regain the White House.

The supreme court’s order was unsigned. Conservative justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito indicated they would have heard Missouri’s case.

Trump was found guilty in May of falsifying business records to cover up a $130,000 payment to porn star Stormy Daniels in exchange for her silence before the 2016 election about a sexual encounter she has said she had with Trump. Prosecutors have said the payment was designed to boost his presidential campaign in 2016, when he defeated Hillary Clinton.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Shut the fuck up Missouri, adults are taking

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Their argument for standing seems patently absurd. IANAL.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Just the way Thomas and Alito like it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Standing, who's that?

-2024 SCOTUS

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, I was taking a nap.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I just asked where you were on a different post with the same story. I was worried about you!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Of course, Alito and Thomas were all for hearing it, and no doubt to rubber-stamp it. It's a miracle Roberts didn't concur.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

rare supreme court w

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I feel like the next layer of headlines in the future will be, "Judge halts ban on delays to curb stoppage."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Does Trump still have a live appeal on some kind of immunity thing in this case? Has he appealed the New York verdict at all?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/05/supreme-court-trump-sentencing-hush-money-case-update
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/30/trump-trial-hush-money-verdict
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support