tengkuizdihar

joined 1 year ago
[–] tengkuizdihar 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Actually good design!

[–] tengkuizdihar 51 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How far up the ivory tower do you need to be to ignore homelessness by denying its existence?

[–] tengkuizdihar 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Didn't they contacted the owners mom about this? Fucking disgusting practices.

[–] tengkuizdihar 1 points 4 months ago

My projects! Changing regulation for the better, knowing the one who will enjoy it will be those who were born aftrr me! Supporting open source projects, making a business out of some of it, to support the other projects!

[–] tengkuizdihar 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I can imagine this to tank my PC performance, especially on large projects lol

[–] tengkuizdihar 2 points 4 months ago

Man the license is a doozy https://www.fab.com/eula

[–] tengkuizdihar 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Really? There is a law already for this?

[–] tengkuizdihar 18 points 4 months ago (7 children)

I think we need a very strict regulation, where the wording is never "purchase" or "buy" or "own". It should always be "rent". Because that's what it is.

[–] tengkuizdihar 1 points 4 months ago

Youre right damn

[–] tengkuizdihar 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Data information == metadata?

(2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.

imo this also includes "the data must be open". The data used for training must be obtainable.

[–] tengkuizdihar 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not caring about what Russia wants? Why not, its a big country with big influence?

[–] tengkuizdihar 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

The description mentioned open source ai definition doesnt require data to be open. But https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition explicitly require the data to be open?

view more: ‹ prev next ›