spaceape

I have Elite: Dangerous. I literally built a 6D motion sensor headtracking rig with IR diodes and a modified PS EYE. 30 hours of config later I had the P E R F E C T config, so I moved on to new games.

Balancing the insane ADS in Cyberpunk 2077 by manually editing core files while battling 150+ mods, now that's what I call enjoyable gaming!

I’m no physicist so your guess is as good as mine.

Considering the theory is based on emerging physical sciences and even you refer to papers detailing the concept, would it be fair to say it's more than a guess while not proven science?

No, your god will not allow it.

I build my desktop setup from Debian base so I can be more offbeat than the arch crowd.

It looks like the command you're trying to paste contains danger---

yes, yes I know what paste is let gooooo

I am forced to judge your entire character based solely on your snap use.

Have you ever tried to challenge the system and see what happens if you don't click restart?

I’m to tired to make quality posts.

There's room for shitty posts too. 🫂

I understand what you mean, I thing the Kardashev scale is useful to put it in a perspective beyond dollars or even workhours.

extaordinary evidence and we have none.

None that we, the public, are aware of. Whether or not one consider a cover-up plausible is a bigger discussion. According to the latest ~~whispers~~ shouts in Washington, there's quite a lot more. What's your impression of Grusch, the UFO whistleblower?

aliens still have to obey the known laws of physics.

I absolutely agree. But maybe we have a differing point of view on our knowledge... Would you say that we understand the universe to the point where we can exclude any significant further discoveries that would transform our understanding of physics?

I think gravity based propulsion could be a part of it. Is the speed of light constant if someone can mess with the M in E=MC²? Would a piloted craft be unbound by inertia and make impossible maneuvers, accelerate from 0-1000 mph. with no problems if it had no mass?

Gravity based propulsion would explain a few of the unexplainable things. And recent scientific discoveries surrounding gravity does more to support the possibility than disprove it.

Energy are rumored to come from zero-point energy, tech close indistinguishable it or stabilized Moscovium. Whatever it is, based on what we publicly know it's not using any propulsion system we're familiar with - So that rules out chemical rocketry from the start.

I have the impression there was great interest in UFO's in the years after Roswell - It's even called "The 50's Ufomania" - But then it kind of died off from the mainstream conversation. UFO's, alien visitors and such didn't really "come back" until the very late 70's/Early 80's. Then it seemed to go quieter again around the 2000's.

Any thoughts on the seemingly varied pop-cultural interest in the phenomena? Is it just cultural? Perhaps a lid was lifted? Maybe someone even encouraged the pop-culture industry to make movies like Close Encounters and E.T.? Is my impression off?

I've chosen to be skeptical of Garry Nolan due to his history both working together with CIA and his work in the UFO field. I didn't know about the Defence and Space company Copernicus Space Corporation, but seeing it's ran by ex-military and establishment profiles... I guess I have to distance myself from these elements of the UFO/UAP discussion.