It’s frustrating that neither Nolan or Loeb can talk about what they’ve seen but makes sense that they need to finish analyzing and publish first. That said, I’m really curious what it was.
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs
1214 readers
1 users here now
A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.
New to Lemmy?
See the Getting Started Guide
Want Disclosure?
Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.
Community Spotlight
Featured Posts and User Investigations
Useful Links
- UAP Guide
- Disclosure Diaries
- UAP Timeline
- UFOs Wiki
- MUFON - Mutual UFO Network
- Investigate a Sighting
- Report a Sighting
Community Rules
- Follow the Code of Conduct.
- Posts must be on-topic.
- No duplicate posts.
- No commercial activity.
- No memes.
- Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
- Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
- Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
- Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
- Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.
Other Communities
If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I share your frustration. I'm sure they are waiting for the peer review process, which is the correct way to do this if you intend to bring the scientific community fully into the fold.
To quote Schitt’s Creek, just fold them in!
It sounds like Nolan is talking about a CE5 thing to me.
I got a similar vibe as well, however, I'll suspend judgement until more information is revealed.
“CE5” has a lot of baggage, but it’s easy shorthand. Regardless of the baggage, I’m open to the idea consciousness is mixed into the soup that is UAP and a deeper understanding of the universe.
That sums up my thoughts on it as well.
That's exciting
I concur!
I've chosen to be skeptical of Garry Nolan due to his history both working together with CIA and his work in the UFO field. I didn't know about the Defence and Space company Copernicus Space Corporation, but seeing it's ran by ex-military and establishment profiles... I guess I have to distance myself from these elements of the UFO/UAP discussion.
I believe he was initially approached to look into and study individuals who encountered UAP as he had the only equipment to do so. I'm less skeptical of Garry as he's approaching this from a scientific lens and publishing papers to be peer reviewed.