meowMix2525

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Close your eyes and lie very still

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago

Hard disagree on all points.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Not sure why you would think Germany is the best in this respect as I've often heard the opposite in my travels there. They are very anti-tech in government, privacy/cybersecurity reasons are what's usually cited.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's not "doing nothing" it's demonstrating that their "viable" candidate is not an acceptable candidate. You're demonstrating that the people reject them and that we have the power to prevent their victory, putting pressure on them to earn the votes of the people, necessitating changes to be made and concessions given if they wish to stay in power.

Unless they can convince all of you folks to abandon your blocs and "vote blue no matter who". Then they have free license to do whatever they want, and to let the other side continue being the bogey man that gets you to the polls, because without you your bloc is too weak to affect their victory.

It's a self-fulfilling prophecy; by saying you are too weak to effect change and arguing as much instead of demonstrating in solidarity with other objectors that genocide is a policy that will guarantee defeat for the Democrats now and in the foreseeable future, because the other side is unacceptable (which implies that your side to you, even if genocidal, is acceptable, because of the comforts you believe they are promising over the other side), then you yourself are participating in the thing that is making you too weak to effect change and in the process throwing those people who are subject to the genocide under the bus in service of your own comfort.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

For them, it's a database with a UI and a chart module.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that's okay for military purposes either tbh. Actually it's pretty disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Not really. It just means onlyfans pays more than Spotify... which seems obvious to me??? A direct subscription to an artist vs only a few cents per play... yeah, no brainer, the artist is going to make less money in the latter deal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

eh. Not my style.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Don't worry comrade I'm holding the line here in Michigan 🫡 one less vote for Trump!!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah good luck with that buddy that's definitely been effective in the past and totally isn't more of what got us here in the first place and isn't actively undermined by the current protests going on and the presidency being at stake for them and their policies still not budging or their voters' demands even being acknowledged.

 

I've noticed that inline images will render to fill the available width of the comment they're on. This is much too large for some images, such as emotes that only have so many pixels to display and thus get blown out and fuzzy. I would much prefer inline images to render in their native resolution up until they reach the width of the comment. Is there already a way to change this behavior or is it not something that has been implemented?

view more: next ›