If you want to read some monads in the wild, go check the code for Jane's Street "core_unix.command_unix"
Otherwise, GADT, but they are used sparingly because they make type inference undecidable
kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E
joined 2 years ago
Sorry to that guy, but Python is a terrible choice for GUI. It simply doesn't even exist in the wild, except in newbies' minds. You should pick something that allows you to* easily & immediately* reload your GUI in progress without restarting the program; AND also maybe think about how to distribute your GUI on other computers without requiring them to duplicate your python setup
Every single wanabe developer starts with writing some python GUI, while i ve been working for 7 years and yet yo write a single GUI in python.. I did write a GUI in java, once, for 3 month or smth. It got scrapped for a web version.
Meh. He s wrong and he knows it. Computer science is definitely about efficient use of computational resources and memory.
So they posted that screenshot before even trying to run it on some useless file to see it works.. Internet points are surely a drug
React +python + postgres/sqlite
We have a solution
Did they pay every news outlet out there to publish stupid titles? That's not a fucking apology. Stop pretending
Your last question is equivalent to : why there so many math theories? Can't we just reuse the old ones?
New language appear as a natural product from research in type theory for ex
Even something as ubiquitous as JSON is not handled in the same way in different databases, same goes for Dates, and UUID. I am not even mentioning migrations scripts. As soon as you start writing raw SQL, I pretty sure you will hit a compatibility issue.
I was specifically talking about python, can't argue with golang. OK you have a valid point for performance, gotta keep an eye on that. However, I am satisfied for our CRUD api
and how you run your tests? Do you spawn a DB backend for test purposes?
I would be lying if I said that I was a professional Ocaml developer.
I do definitely think the Jane's library is very hard to read... But that might be my inexperience
I personally think regular, procedural code is much easier to read ¯_(ツ)_/¯