I'm sure they had good reasons to make the switch, but I don't really understand the argument about kernel and ruby versions. An upgrade to the newest LTS release would have gotten them ruby 3.2 and probably a newer kernel as well.
To resolve these, OpenStreetMap needed to switch to newer mainline kernels, naturally leading them toward Debian.
Because Debian is known for its up to date software, right? Gave me a good chuckle.
TIFU by using eclipse
git LFS might be for you. If the data takes so long to reprocess I think it is fine to check it in (possibly using LFS).
I used to do this, but imho the used language is hardly a useful index. When does it happen that you want to see everything written python? For me that's never.
Also where do you put multi-language projects? Like, go backend with typescript frontend or whatever.
I push every project I work on right away to my gitea instance. If I expect not to work on something for some time I just delete the local copy.
When I change devices or hit file size limits, I’ll compress and send things to my NAS.
Well, that sounds inconvenient.
Damn right he owes us!! /s
How is being python-based a good thing?
Ja, also dass die Überschrift mist ist da sind wir uns einig. Mein Punkt war eher, dass ich glaube, dass es nicht die Intention der Autoren war die Strafe als überzogen oder ungerecht darzustellen und dass die Überschrift eben nur so ist wie sie ist damit Leute auf den Artikel klicken.
Finde ehrlich gesagt nicht, dass man den Autoren hier unterstellen kann, dass sie es so framen als wäre er nur 1km/h zu schnell gefahren. Im Text taucht die Aussage ja eigentlich nur als Zitat vom Fahrer auf und wird dann auch als uneinsichtig eingeordnet. Der Titel ist halt einfach Clickbait.
Seems like a year ago he was actually using Linux himself. Wondering what happened that made him feel so butthurt.
Love how the top comment doesn't even answer the question. But TIL, I guess. If I had known this option existed, I probably would have used it. I'm going to play the "not a native english speaker"-card on this one.
That's what I'm doing too. Kind of felt wrong to do that, but if you don't need the extra features of docker volumes this is the way. It always puzzles me when I read "Volumes are easier to back up or migrate than bind mounts." in the docs. How are these --volumes-from shenanigans easier than rsyncing some directory off the host?