No, even if you only had one unit for a physical quantity, you would still need to specify that unit to know which physical quantity you are describing. E.g. "That object over there is 15" vs "That object over there is 15 kg".
The symbol for temperature, measured in Celsius, is "°C". It's atomic and can't be separated, since that would result in °, which represents the angle of something, not the temperature, and C, which is the symbol for Coulomb, which measures electric charge.
If it's like the system in Sweden, it's actually ~$400 straight up benefit, and ~$800 in a very favourable (optional) loan with very low interest that is paid back over 25 years.
Not without the alarm going off
#Wordle1149 5/6* Grade: C+
⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛ F
🟨⬛⬛🟨🟨 C-
🟩⬛🟩⬛🟩 B-
🟩⬛🟩⬛🟩 B-
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 A+
The source paper is available online, is published in a peer reviewed journal, and has over 600 citations. I'm inclined to believe it.
That's why these systems should never be used as the sole decision makers, but instead work as a tool to help the professionals make better decisions.
Keep the human in the loop!
Not all diabetes is caused by excess sugar intake
I would use single x and y when they are meant to replace numbers, and multiple xx and yy when replacing text.
E.g.
I disagree, and would argue that both are about equally frequent. For example, my phone shows °C in the weather widget, while the weather app only uses °. That does not change the fact that the actual unit is °C, and that would not change even if the whole world switched away from °F, and your original comment about the display having °C implying that °F still exists is therefore incorrect.