SorteKanin

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

No thanks, I’ll be staying with datastruct.nextState() rather than const nextState = prevState.nextState()

You can easily do the first option in Rust, you just use the mut keyword. That's it, nothing more than that. And you'll find that you quite rarely have to do that, and when you do it, it's actually quite a useful signal to be aware of, since mutability sometimes means a bit more surprising data changes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't even call that a functional feature, that's just the language being based on expressions and bool having a then method. It's more object-oriented in that sense if anything tbh

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

I really think you should give Rust a chance. It is not a functional language, like Haskell. Haskell is a hardcore purely functional language. Rust is not a purely functional language - instead it just borrows a few features and ideas from functional langauges. It also borrows ideas from object-oriented languages and it is inspired by C++ in some aspects (or has at least learned from C++, I guess you could say).

Could you maybe elaborate what it is about the functional ideas in Rust you don't like? I really only see them as benefits - Rust is like the best of both worlds. The good stuff from functional and the good stuff from object-oriented.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The problem with classes is inheritance. Inheritance is just a bad idea and a bad way to structure stuff if you ask me.

Rust fixes this neatly with traits that basically provide the same benefits as classes without any of the downsides.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Sorry but immutable by default just makes sense. When you start coding Rust you'll see how rarely you actually need to use the mut keyword. It's quite rare actually.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The number of users is not really what drives costs honestly. Or at least, it's not like a linear relationship. I think actually having many popular communities might be a bigger issue.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jeg var ved at lave samme joke for et par timer siden, men jeg besindede mig 😂

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

I mean, I can't really take credit - the users on Feddit.dk are the ones that deserve the praise. I've been very surprised at the willingness to donate. We have almost 18 months of runway and that runway has mostly only gone up as time went by. Feddit.dk is not going anywhere anytime soon :)

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

About 62 USD per month. I post monthly finance updates. All the costs are covered by user donations so far :)

It might be possible to do it cheaper, but I feel I got a good deal for some very high end hardware so this setup should be scalable going forward for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Please be aware that user-level instance blocking is not the same as instance-level defederation. User-level instance blocking is equivalent to blocking all the communities from that instance. AFAIK you'll still see posts and comments from the blocked instance in other communities. More problematically, the blocked instance still influences your feed via its votes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No. User-level instance blocking is not the same as instance-level defederation. User-level instance blocking is equivalent to blocking all the communities from that instance. AFAIK you'll still see posts and comments from the blocked instance in other communities. More problematically, the blocked instance still influences your feed via its votes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Mon ikke 500'eren er til HCA? Han er da klart den mest kendte.

32
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

For transparens laver jeg hver måned et indlæg om Feddit.dks finanser og andet af relevans.

I august måned modtog Feddit.dk 252 kroner i donationer, fra @[email protected], @[email protected] og et par anonyme donorer. Tak for det 🙂.

De 252 kroner dækker ikke de månedlige udgifter på 416 kroner (det skal dog ses i lyset af en meget stor mængde donationer i juli). Derved er kassebeholdningen faldet til 7362 kroner hvilket giver en "runway" på cirka 17.5 måneder.

Man kan donere til Feddit.dk gennem Liberapay (https://da.liberapay.com/Feddit.dk/). Man er også meget velkommen til at støtte Feddit.dk ved at være en aktiv bruger og/eller fortælle andre om siden. Især det at fortælle andre om Feddit.dk er vigtigt for at få flere brugere, da vi ikke kører nogen reklamer - den eneste måde andre kan opdage siden er gennem jer!

Nye administratorer

@[email protected] og @[email protected] har indtil videre fungeret som moderatorer på tværs af forskellige fællesskaber på Feddit.dk og har også hjulpet med at se ansøgninger fra nye brugere igennem.

I august måned har jeg udnævnt dem som reelle administratorer på Feddit.dk. Dette giver dem beføjelser i alle fællesskaber, inklusive dem udenfor Feddit.dk og de vil også modtage alle rapporter, ligesom jeg har gjort indtil videre. Jeg er dog stadig den eneste med adgang til serveren og alt det tekniske.

Feddit.dk har på nuværende tidspunkt ingen formelle vedtægter eller styringsstruktur, bortset fra moderationspolitikken. Det kan dog være en god ide at tænke over den slags inden det bliver nødvendigt, især lige nu når der foregår en vis mængde drama omkring moderation og styring andetsteds. Hvis man har nogle holdninger eller kommentarer til hvordan en eventuel styringsstruktur/vedtægter bør se ud, så er man meget velkommen til at dele dem, enten her i kommentarsporet eller i privatbesked til administrationsholdet.


Som altid kan man stille spørgsmål ved at skrive i kommentarerne eller i privatbesked.

view more: ‹ prev next ›