MirthfulAlembic

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

I was thinking the same thing. This seems like investigative journalism that's more public and without the ethics and rigor part.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They are very much as a whole not negligible. They can be--people can get checks for cents sometimes. But they wouldn't go on strike and sign a deal if it never amounted to anything. I'm not even in the industry and have a passing familiarity with the concept; I've just been reading about it and listening to people from it for years.

DGA also has residuals in their contract. IATSE might for some roles, but you can't feasibly give everyone involved in a production residuals. The point of residuals is to hold over people in roles that are very fickle and can go years between jobs, like everyday working actors and writers. If you're going years between jobs getting hired for craft services, your food might just suck.

It would be great if everyone could get a share, but that's not realistic. Big productions can have thousands of people who work on them. Having to send the carpenter on a film a check for two cents yearly would create insane administrative overhead. There has to be a line somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I know. This is one of my major pet peeves, that even major publications seem to skip copy editing. I'll forgive it in an independent journalist's substack, but not much more.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

While they are still insufficient, residuals do exist. It's why SAG and WGA went on strike last year, since streaming residuals were (and to a degree still are) garbage. It's not as directly tied to sales as if they received points, but with Hollywood accounting that's a risk. Though if you're talking about Nebula, maybe this is more about YouTube creators which is a different can of worms.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

It really depends. One tenant could have an ant problem because another adjacent tenant is attracting them, which the landlord needs to address. If the structure has decaying wood, that can attract carpenter ants which is a landlord issue. Some ants like humid environments, so a poorly ventilated structure (like one with mold) could be the cause--also the landlord's problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Valuing proximity to power more than having personal morals.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Matt Walsh read this comment and is crying and throwing up as a result.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago

Judging by how many numerical fields on mobile websites still give me the full keyboard, maybe not.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Probably because it already has a lot of memorials and, having been there, does not have a lot of space to add more without turning it from a functional park to an outside museum. There are a lot of historical public spaces in Boston that are unable to function as anything besides a tourist spot due to that. Bostonians still exist and need green spaces to live and play.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I've never had a fruit salad with the consistency of salsa, but I see where you're coming from. They are very close relatives.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

The article is using as a source a 4chan post that had a docket number that didn't check out. I'm pretty sure this is a joke someone took seriously because they needed to publish something today.

This would get almost immediately dismissed by any judge.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

The shareholders in question suing are a public employee retirement fund. I wouldn't exactly consider retired sanitation workers and bureaucrats societal leeches, but to each their own I guess.

view more: next ›