Justdaveisfine

I would likely have different thoughts on it if I (and others) was able to consent my data into training it, or consent to even have it rather than it just showing up in an unwanted update.

Yeah the other reply noted the same thing. This would have been about ~2015 and she was in pre-k so someone must have named their kid based on the legend. I can't recall if the girl was black or not but I don't think she was.

There's actually somewhat of a resurgence for retro-ish games even among new gamers.

General consumers are mostly keeping up with the latest releases or updates because that's what their friends or streamers are talking about. High fidelity adds to that but I don't know if that's the big draw. Especially since things like Roblox, Minecraft, and Fortnite seem to be the juggernauts right now.

Its just harder to create new conversations around something like Ps2 games because all the talk around them has passed.

True, though people tend to replace laptops when they fall out of support or start having hardware issues, much less often to do an upgrade looking for more frames.

I still feel Microsoft has to bring something hot to really sway anyone over since they have a long history of competing in the mobile hardware space and fumbling it hard.

Well a Windows license is just that: Here is a code for the OS, have fun. They don't care because most support will be from hardware vendors.

Microsoft hardware is a different beast. You need to have parts for replacement, its got to be compatible (and stay compatible) with whatever accessories are coming out, and its got to be better than its competitors on new game launches. That last part takes coordination and support with dev teams.

Don't care isn't a great option, unless Microsoft wants another Windows Phone or Zune or one of the many other failed hardware launches they've had.

So it'll be the ROG Ally but 'better' because its less Windows than normal. Hmm.

The last part concerns me. Why am I buying into a platform that Microsoft couldn't care less if it sells at all because they make their money from subscriptions?

People don't want hardware that just gets abandoned when its not profitable enough, which Microsoft absolutely has a history of doing.

Seems like everyone was all over Avowed the week it was out, then I hardly heard it mentioned at all until now.

That being said, these seem like some nice QoL features but I don't really see this persuading many people to hop in and buy it.

This feels weirdly too late. I can't imagine that many people in 2027 who passed on a Switch 1/2, SteamDeck, supposed other upcoming handhelds, or the ROG Ally and are looking for a gaming handheld with money to burn.

Xbox has to really bring something hot to the table, and its certainly not whatever they've been doing with their hardware/games/IPs for the past 5 years.

For some reason it didn't click to me until I saw the Steam page that this game is set in the same universe as Control.

Seems the article is from 2008, and the La-a I know of was in pre-k in ~2015, so it seems someone named their kid based on the legend.

There's a story about a man (Hennig Brand) who figured since pee was yellow, and gold was yellow, maybe if you boil urine down enough you can get the 'gold' out of it and make lots of stacks of cash.

Unfortunately this didn't work, but it did yield a process to create phosphorous which ended up being a valuable chemical process, of which he sold to other alchemists at the time (Who in turn tried to figure out how to turn the new found phosphorous to gold).

As I recall, Will Wright's inspiration for the Sims was watching his daughter play with dolls in a dollhouse.

When viewed through that lens, yeah I can see how that formula works.