FizzyOrange

joined 1 year ago
[–] FizzyOrange 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Eh, it practice it works extremely well. I can't remember a single instance where a PDF document rendered incorrectly.

The format is very old so it's not surprising it has picked up a few WTFs. I'm happy to keep those hidden below the abstraction.

[–] FizzyOrange 17 points 1 week ago

Totally depends what you end up working on as a programmer. If it's web apps, you'll be totally fine. All you need is basic arithmetic. Writing a game engine? You'll need to know some basic to moderate matrix maths...

If you're doing formal verification using unbounded model checking... good fucking luck.

On average I would say most programming tasks need very little maths. If you can add and multiply you'll be fine. Definitely sounds like you'll be ok.

[–] FizzyOrange 2 points 1 week ago

Nice work. Aren't wasm proc macros already prototyped in Watt though?

[–] FizzyOrange 3 points 1 week ago

Why do you say it needs more time in the oven? I've had zero issues with it as a drop-in replacement for Pip in a large commercial project, which is an extremely impressive achievement. (And it was 10x faster.)

I tried Poetry once and it failed to resolve dependencies on the first thing I tried it on. If anything Poetry needs more time in the oven. It also wasn't 10x faster.

[–] FizzyOrange 0 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Is there any reason to use this now that Krita exists, sane name and all?

[–] FizzyOrange 2 points 1 week ago

I agree, those are fantastic icons. Very clear.

[–] FizzyOrange 2 points 1 week ago

I don't think libuv is really that popular, nor is it that confusing.

But I do agree it's not a very good name. "Rye" is a much better name. Probably too late anyway.

[–] FizzyOrange 31 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Yes it's terrible. The only hope on the horizon is uv. It's significantly better than all the other tooling (Poetry, pip, pipenv, etc.) so I think it has a good chance of reducing the options to just Pip or uv at least.

But I fully expect the Python Devs to ignore it, and maybe even make life deliberately difficult for it like they did for static analysers. They have some strange priorities sometimes.

[–] FizzyOrange 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's also CPC/Farnell but none of those are in the same league as McMaster Carr. Much smaller ranges, worse prices, worse websites, missing CAD models, etc.

Another option is Misumi but they have even worse prices and don't even sell to individuals.

I'd recommend going to McMaster Carr just to see what we are missing out on.

[–] FizzyOrange 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I wish we had something like McMaster Carr in the UK. I don't even care if it's fast! You guys had better appreciate how good you've got it.

[–] FizzyOrange 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well they still have runtimes, but yes they can be pretty minimal.

You're still shipping a load of libraries that come for free with JS though, e.g. with Rust WASM string formatting and unicode support always ends up being annoyingly huge, and that's built in to JS engines. There's also collections (Map, Set), etc.

[–] FizzyOrange 3 points 2 weeks ago

There's a "proper" version of this hack called early oom. I haven't used it though and now that I look at it it seems like it uses the same completely broken "guess which process to kill, who cares if it's init" system that the normal oom killer uses so your solution sounds better.

Is it so hard to just pause the system and ask the user which app to kill?

view more: ‹ prev next ›