But people who don't return carts are just as bad as landlords???
Source: xkcd
Oh you're right, I read that as 490,000, sorry. Thanks
OK, but what arithmetic?
Where did those numbers come from? MAU/users ismore like 25%?
That's the part that gets me. If it were just not removing content, well, I'd probably still complain but they'd have a coherent freedom of speech argument. But... they have to pay Nazis to make Nazi content and take a cut, otherwise it's censorship and that somehow helps the Nazis?
I had a dm who would tell us to roll. And then say "you fail" before hearing the number
I mean it worked in Wyoming didn't it?
Well, you're commenting on a Mastodon post...
I think these are great rules, so long as they never have any teeth.
That's really the entire article. "Yeah, for now its run by hippies who care about privacy and run servers out of a sense of civic duty, but we can fix that"
Tbh I'm struggling to imagine what this would look like in something like Lemmy. It seems to be describing an extreme form of setting your account to private, but this only really makes sense in a situation where you have followers who are friends and family. How would I decide who to "approve"?