Buffalox

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

I really hope the silence from allies is because we are waiting for the American election to be over.
All limitations on Ukraine need to be lifted, and USA has only supplied 10% of what they promised.

Ukraine has fought admirably, it's time we help them to end this. Not just enable them to draw it out indefinitely.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Doesn't have to be NATO, it could be bilateral agreements, like Russia did with North Korea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Are we seriously still, in the year 2024

I was a teenager in the 70's, and I agree, this is NOT the future I dreamed about.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

X's most recent report, covering February to July 2024, showed that its user base in the EU fell once more to 105.9 million.

And these are datapoints they release themselves, 3rd party data points hint at bigger losses.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That can be the case, but IMO Terminator 2 was an amazing follow up, and it had 15 times bigger budget.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

it takes over management of the planet

Novel Colossus from 1966 has exactly that.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I too was shocked and a bit offended that it was called a B movie. But the budget was a freaking measly $6.4 million.
That's peanuts even back in 1984.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Terminator

Indeed they accomplished a lot, an all time classic movie. Some of my friends were a bit critical about the stop motion not being very good in their opinion. But I just thought the movie was amazing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The Tesla model S came out in 2012. I just remember that when Musk made that tweet, I'd already identified Musk as a conman.
But I don't remember anything in particular that stood out as much before that tweet. Except he had already failed on his promise on FSD, with little to show it was even close. I also remember identifying him as an introvert narcissist. Which is kind of an oxymoron, but nonetheless describes his public social conduct.

If you are old, do you remember Lee Iacocca (Chrysler)? Or Jack Tramiel (Commodore)?
Those were stellar businessmen and CEOs, that were geniuses without being narcissistic sociopaths.
Those were true role models. 😀

[–] [email protected] 40 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

it’s been like 4 years.

I think it's pretty obviously been more than that: https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/03/media/elon-musk-testifies/index.html

On July 15, 2018, Musk tweeted “pedo guy” in reference to Vernon Unsworth

For the worlds richest man, and CEO of multiple companies to tweet like that, you'd have to be pretty far gone already.
Musk has probably "had issues" most of his life, but at this point he obviously lost control publicly, and was unable to contain it.

Musk is a spoiled brat who thinks his behavior has no consequences to him. This continues to be mostly true, so his behavior gets steadily worse, because he has no shame and no reason to believe he will be held accountable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

https://archive.fo/VnQUu

In public, TSMCdownplayed, opens new tab the comments, with its founder calling Gelsinger“a bit rude.” Privately, TSMC said it would no longer honor the discount, the sources said: about 40% off the $23,000, 3-nanometer wafers on which TSMC would print chips for Intel. Intel had to pay full price, shrinking its profit margin on the deal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

and give off vibes it was a charitable

WTF! I did no such thing, that's 100% on you to put that into it. I think they did it to discourage Intel from investing too heavily in their own production which would compete with TSMC.

Even if Intel aren’t the good guys

Again WTF? Where did any of that come from? They are businesses, their purpose is to make money!

You are being delusional.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

If you can offer a 40% discount and still make profit

Maybe they didn't? Or at least maybe not much.

if you’re shilling this much for TSMC

What? How am I shilling for TSMC? And I'm 100% an AMD guy myself, I freaking stuck to AMD during the whole Buldozer shitty period, because I didn't want an Intel monopoly. And I bought AMD stock when they revealed Ryzen.

So I do NOT encourage a TSMC monopoly either.

 

The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 07.10.24 approximately amounted to:

personnel – about 660470 (+1160) people
Tanks – 8933 (+14) units
armored combat vehicles – 17710 (+31) units
Artillery systems – 19156 (+64) units
MLRS – 1223 (+7) units
air defense – 972 (+2) units
aircraft – 368 (+0) units
helicopters – 328 (+0) units
Operative-Tactical level UAV – 16643 (+65)
Cruise missiles – 2615 (+2)
Ships /boats – 28 (+0) units
submarines – 1 (+0) units
motor vehicles and tankers – 26102 (+96) units
special equipment – 3364 (+1)

The data is being clarified.

Fight the occupier! Together we will win!

SOURCE: https://www.mil.gov.ua/news/2024/10/07/zagalni-bojovi-vtrati-rosiyan-za-dobu-1160-osib-7-rszv-ta-14-tankiv/

Translated with Firefox.

 

AOC speech at the 2024 Democratic National Convention

 

https://noshingwiththenolands.com/what-is-the-scoville-scale/
Scroll lidt ned, så er der en fremragende oversigt.

 

Russia has launched an offensive into the Kharkiv region, and it has created a lot of alarmist news reports. In reality it is difficult to see what Russia's plan is, and it is not self-evident that it is a smart use of resources. In this video I discuss whether we might be seeing a return to the fragmented command structures that Russia had in the beginning of the war.

76
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

My old $200 Motorola G9 Power phone lasted almost 4 years with only very minor scratches. Obviously in that period I have dropped it a few times getting out of the car, where the phone sometimes work itself out of my pant pocket while I drive, and then it slips out when I get out of the car. But no problem on my previous phones, despite the Moto had cheap Panda glass front.

Then I bought my $800 glass back Xiaomi 13T Pro in January, and I loved the phone for the camera and good specs. But alas after only 4 months, and single drop of just 30 cm while sitting on the porch, the glass back immediately cracked! The back now looks like an ugly mess, and the high water resistance is very likely gone too.

For sure the last time I buy a phone with a glass back!!!

I wonder why glass back is so popular, and I curse the media for reviewing the Samsung Galaxy S2 as "feeling a bit cheap", because the back was synthetic, and drop tests showed it was 10 times as durable as the iPhone with its glass back.

Samsung did it right in the beginning, glass backs are a curse.

PS: I don't use condoms for my phones, if they need that for daily use, it's an obvious design flaw!!!

The glass back is supposedly there to give a premium feel to the phone. But because it's fragile, people have to use a cover, but with the cover, the premium feel of a glass back is gone anyways?
How is glass back not a design flaw?

EDIT FOR CLARIFICATION:

I am not clumsy, that's why I believe the phone should be able to last without cover. This was the first time the phone slid out of my packet, and I've NEVER dropped it out of my hands. One 30 cm slip and it's broken. Where for instance my Moto had maybe 4-6 in all over the years, and remained unscathed, apart from some tiny scratches.
The sliding out of pocket does occur maybe a couple of times per year, but it's a low drop, and the phone should absolutely be able to handle that tiny drop, as it's an item for everyday use.
I've also never had problems with scratches on my screen on any phone, which is the reason people use screen protectors I guess, which I don't either, because they are ugly, for instance they create a tiny ring around the camera, and they feel awful IMO, my phone came with it, and it took exactly 10 seconds for me to decide to remove it, because I could feel the edge of the screen protector when using the phone.
But please stop with the dropping my phone regularly comments! Just because I dropped my Moto a few times (slid out of pocket) over almost 4 years! Always from low height, which it should be able to handle a few times.

 

Profits were expected to be halved from the 2022 1.2 tn Rubles, but instead they made a loss in 2023 of 629bn Rubles or £5.5bn.

view more: next ›