Andreas

What are the odds that the random website it gave me was my physics study guide in high school? The Hyperphysics website

I think that if a platform wants to support long-form content, it needs to make design choices around long-form. It can't be a short-form content UX with an arbitrary limit removed so that long posts can be created, if they're going to be displayed and interacted with in the same way as 280 character tweets.

Some design choices that made Tumblr better for long-form posts and discussion: Being able to tag a post without writing the tag inside the main post body, so posts can be categorized without messing up the content. Text formatting support. Media can be inserted into any part of the text instead of forcing them to appear at the bottom of the post. Q&A. Post archives. Custom blog theming. One account can have multiple blogs to organize content. Replies show the context of what they're replying to when shared. Support for commenting on posts. They combined these effectively with short-form design like the centralized feed of posts and interaction buttons.

Another reason I prefer Tumblr over Twitter is because Tumblr's format makes discussion most visible, while Twitter makes soapboxing most visible. Tumblr's design has flaws, but it's the best example of platform design that balances long-form, short-form and discussion in my opinion.

It supports both, which is why I like Tumblr's format the most. You can make short status updates like Twitter or long, informative articles on the same blog and it doesn't look out of place.

Many of the online stores I shop at have offers like "leave a review and you'll get a coupon for your next purchase", so they get a lot of pointless reviews like "It arrived. Didn't try the product yet. 5 stars"

I find that there's a very strong correlation between the average age of the customer base and the uselessness of the reviews.

I don't blame the community for wanting to avoid enshittification. In an ideal world, everyone should.

But that's not what they're doing. They're not making any concrete protests to Tumblr's anti-privacy and anti-user changes. They refuse to search for and create Tumblr alternatives. They only cry (on Tumblr) about how Tumblr is the only site left for them, please don't add this feature my autism and depression can't handle it blah blah blah. They're actively sabotaging monetization strategies that are user-friendly. They are - as a low-tech demographic that would rather have a "free" service than a paid user-friendly one - the reason why Tumblr has to enshittify.

Used Tumblr for 11 years because Tumblr has my favorite microblogging format. No longer frequently. The user quality dropped massively after December 2018.

The term "enabling PVP" was suggested by Tumblr users because of the aggressive attitude the community would have towards sponsored posts. As you can expect, nobody wants to spend money to be harassed, and terms like this turn people off spending money on the site.

I don't understand why Tumblr admins embrace the factors that make spending money on Tumblr bad, instead of culling the free users who attack paying users. It's not even like the remaining Tumblr users can revolt. They're hated by the rest of the internet, they don't have anywhere else to go and they don't have the tech know-how to set up their own site. Tumblr can't expect to maintain their "unique website culture" and make money at the same time.

I used to be interested in Tumblr joining the Fediverse, as someone who strongly prefers Tumblr's long-form microblogging to Twitter's format. Unfortunately, Tumblr has shown itself to be just like any money-hungry corporation at a smaller scale.

Tumblr is trying to push Tiktok-style short video Tumblr Live, which is filled with trackers, and they have plans to change their UX to be more like Twitter because Twitter is more profitable. Tumblr has the advantage of having a very low percentage of technical users, who accept these changes and don't find workarounds because they don't know what's going on.

With the direction Tumblr is going in, I'd defederate it if it ever starts federating. I want a Fediverse software that mirrors Tumblr's long-form microblogging, not Tumblr itself and definitely not its horrible community.

They had a good idea for monetization which was allowing users to buy advertising space for their own posts. The more you paid, the more users would see your post. Tumblr's own community ruined this by sending harassing comments and messages to the posts that were advertised with this feature.

Tumblr's biggest roadblock to monetization isn't their site structure or ideas, it's their community.

Sen har jag ju hängt på sweddit förut och tröttnat ganska rejält på narativet om hur bra cannabis är för allt.

Bokstavligen jag. Jag pallar inte deras dryga attityd att de som haschrökare vet bäst om reglering och lagstiftning för att de har mest erfarenhet med substansen i fråga. Man frågar inte porrberoende och alkoholberoende när man vill reglera sexköp respektive rattfylleri.

Jag tycker situationen skiljer sig mellan mat och droger då det andra är frivilligt, samtidigt som det finns möjligheter att köpa etiskt odlat kött. Veganpositionen att ett djurs liv ska värderas lika mycket som ett människoliv är subjektiv medan gängens påverkan på samhället är konkret och kopplingen mellan drogköp och gängens inkomster lika stark, så att medvetet bidra till gängen bör inte jämföras med moralen kring köttätande.

This project has a lot of red flags for long-term sustainability. It needs to be forked and maintained by someone who cares about open-source and decentralization, not being a Discord competitor.

• The developers have no plans for financing the platform. In the FAQs, they claim that they managed to raise $2000 in donations, and that covers the costs for now, so they'll think about financing "later".
• For whatever reason, they chose to develop not just the messaging client but the messaging protocol, voice, file and media servers. That creates a lot of work for the small team to maintain.
• They don't want to implement federation, partially because they would have to rewrite their entire backend, but also because...
• They want to force people to use the revolt.chat instance. While Revolt can be self-hosted, the documentation actively discourages this and tries to obfuscate the self-hosting process as much as possible.
• The open-source code is also several versions behind revolt.chat so that revolt.chat can keep an advantage over self-hosted instances.
• The developers are university students who have never developed software professionally or managed a social media platform before.
• Combine all of this with the lack of financing plans and you will have a service that is bound to implode or become enshittified when the operating costs and platform administration become too taxing.

Revolt is a very impressive full-stack project for the developers' experience level, but it's not a good FLOSS Discord alternative.

On another note, why are there so many children in the article's comment section? Is that really the quality of the average Revolt user?

Jag är emot kriminalisering av personligt bruk av cannabis men tänk dig om detta:

• Rökare är medvetna om att deras bruk föder gängen.
• De argumenterar att cannabis är ofarlig och inte skapar beroende och därför ska legaliseras.
• Men de godtar oftast också bojkotterna mot företag med ryska verksamheter eftersom de inte vill bidra till krig och våld.

Så varför slutar deras moral med att inte bidra till krig och våld vid just cannabis? Är det, måntro, på grund av... ett beroende? 😂

Märk också att sidan den här artikeln kommer ifrån heter "cannabisifokus", så klart en webbsida som riktar sig till haschrökare ska hylla allt som gör det lättare för dem att röka som "faktabaserad politik".

Sorry, I don't get this argument. Is not being able to avoid corporations justified because people are forced to use email? Social media is also becoming a lot less optional these days. I know a lot of small businesses that only share location and contact information on Facebook or Instagram, because they don't want to invest in building their own website.

I also hate this concept that there is a hierarchy of users in the Fediverse, the "core users" and I suppose, the "idiots who migrated over from a bigger social media site". Look how well Lemmy performed from 2019 to mid-2023 with only "core users", it was a graveyard. As long as a real person has an account on the Fediverse that they actively use, they are a Fediverse user, and they must be considered when discussing the Fediverse in general.

There will always be instances that do not federate with corporate instances, just like how you can set up an email server that blocks Gmail and Outlook. But I don't want to see a Fediverse where these instances are dead and marginalized because corporate instances consumed most of the Fediverse.