this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
994 points (99.1% liked)

xkcd

8632 readers
1 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://xkcd.com/2893/

Alt text:

Baseballs do present a challenge to this theory, but I'm convinced we just haven't found the right seasoning.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 106 points 9 months ago (3 children)

By the logic of this graph the Earth is slightly more tasty than the moon, yet the moon is made of cheese. Explain that, XKCD.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 9 months ago

The earth contains bacon.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)

the earth contains sparse pockets of cheese, such as France. An entire celestial object of cheese would be overwhelming

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

It has heterogeneity which is good according to prof ragusea

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

earth has over 10,000+ species of edible plants, and 300,000+ that we can't eat

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can't eat, or can eat one time?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Hyperbolic" this, "logarithmic" that, I'm here to propose a radical new theory: all spheres are tasty, your mouth just isn't big enough to have the right tastebuds for the larger ones

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Devourer of worlds for the uninitiated

[–] [email protected] 51 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As a fan of log-scale axes, Randall really ought to at least suspect that the vertical axis is also logarithmic. If so, the average 800m sphere is very much not tasty.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Senses usually are log scale so I assume this would also be correct

[–] kn0wmad1c 40 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How do we know the moon isn't tasty? Isn't it made of cheese?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

If so, it's a very sharp cheese. Do not eat, you'll cut your tongue.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

One can only predict that rabbit poop is delicious.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My dog seems to agree with this sentiment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Rabbits seem to enthusiastically agree as well

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago

Ice bergs. They are kinda round (less so with larger ones) and they are freshwater so entirely edible. According to the graph the object would taste "ok" which is a perfectly adequate description of drinking water.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I bet you could find 800-meter comet made out of ice. I would argue that the water tastes "ok".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do not lick the space ice!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

That is almost certainly the first thing I'd do to space ice

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

There's got to be an 800m wide jawbreaker

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

By this logic, beachballs are okay-tasting.

I argue that the real equation would be some form of y= 1/x

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Based on volume, a baseball would still be in between a grape and a melon, so y=1/x doesn't work either.

I'd go for a density based equation rather than volume.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Astute point. Single-point blackholes must be delicous

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

You'll never want to taste anything else, that's for sure

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Assuming taste is also logarithmic, it actually is y=1/x

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

Yes, that's your mom

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

So, James and the giant peach?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck is with the scale here? How can you even fit meatballs in there if grapes and melons are that close?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

logarithmic scale

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

I knew the Vegas Sphere was hiding something

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Man....uhhh....you should get that checked out......

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, I can't. I eat too many apples

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

My condolences

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

Where does the demon core belong on this

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Peppercorns?

Whole and spherical, not particularly tasty. Changing their shape via grinding, however, unlocks fought-wars-over-the-stuff levels of tastiness.

Please explain.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

They just have too much taste condensed into a tiny sphere, like mass in a white dwarf star. Grinding them down actually extends their surface area and if you were to toss the ground pepper in the air you'd create a haze of taste that may or may not cause a burning sensation in your eyes and respiratory system

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

You have me considering the flavor of Alderaan

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In their base form they're an outlier. Ground up you unlock the full potential of the smallest spheres on the graph.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

You gotta grind them into smaller, tastier spheres

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Your mom!

^sorry, ^you ^know ^I ^had ^to

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Hmm, rabbit turds...

load more comments
view more: next ›