this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
466 points (98.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6672 readers
663 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You might not know this, but that’s how early humans hunted birds.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

If God had wanted them to live he would have given them explosive reactive armor

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There wasn't much meat left after the primary detonation would pierce the soft flesh of the bird but it's tradition.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There must have been some real big birds back then for them to need rocket launchers

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

More oxygen, bigger bugs, bigger birds.

Neanderthals built the first Buick. It was the only way to take down the giant ants. The birds were relatively easy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This is why the Big Bird species is nearly extinct

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is normal when the dinosaurs hunted like this in ancient times:

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That's how I look after Mexican food

Screenshot_20231028-202442_Eternity

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We're these birds also known as dinosaurs?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aiming is still important obviously, but when you start training on these from the age of 6 years old it becomes just as accurate as the older non-atlatl versions

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, at our rocket launcher class for 6 year olds

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You didn't have one? Oh man, those were a blast! A shame little Timmy got his nuts blown off, but hey, that class was worth it!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

His nuts are a sacrifice I am willing to make

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've never held an rpg-7, but what I know of Russian engineering is that it must be so well balanced and fly so true.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Truly unparalleled precision

(Cross cut BMP barrel)

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago

it's called asymmetrical warfare, look it up westoids

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

What are you complaining? You get 3mm more material for free on 1 side!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you’ve never heard of variable bore artillery? This lets the round juke while in flight. /s

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Firing a Russian BMP [REAL] [UNEDITED]

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm conflicted because I'm quite fond of that moment when someone you love tucks your hair behind your ear, but maybe less so using a bullet.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Does the thick part go at the top to prevent barrel-droop?

Or am I overthinking it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does the thick part go at the top to prevent barrel-droop?

Or am I overthinking it?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

No, it's for protection against overfly top attacks from NLAWs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's why you need higher engineering safety margins! Then it doesn't matter how square your barrels are!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you throw it in a 45 angle, it's exactly like the Javelin missile but 100x cheaper. Genius!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That's basically how they launch rockets in Attack on Titan.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The Henry Stickmin.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm actually surprised now that I'm thinking about it that there aren't grenade flinging devices like this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the device you're thinking about is called rifle grenade (soldiers already carry rifles with them)

sometimes 40mm UBGL fills the same role. grenade throwing device like this would probably require different fuzes (longer delay) and it will be much less controllable than anything actually launched (you don't want live grenades ending up nearby by accident, not an option with rifle grenades or 40mms)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

the entire idea kinda died off because you can't fit in rifle grenade anything actually useful against tanks for example, but one resurgence would be 82mm mortars attached to PG-7 series rocket engine and launched from RPG-7, used by Ukrainians

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Or you can just use a giant winch-operated catapult instead.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leach_trench_catapult